lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

68
active users

#billionaires

30 posts27 participants0 posts today

So, when the time comes, our #Farmer friends already have #Pitchforks!

With tractor parade, Maine farmers protest #USDA cuts that could leave many in debt

by Eesha Pendharkar
Wed, April 16, 2025 at 4:12 PM EDT

"Steve Sinisi of Old Crow Ranch in Durham was among dozens of farmers who paraded through the streets of Augusta on Wednesday on tractors bearing signs like 'Support Farmers, Not #Billionaires' and '#CompostTrump.'

"The more than 100 farmers and supporters were there to protest the millions of dollars in federal cuts to agricultural grants and programs and raise awareness about the impacts they would have on their farms and livelihoods."

yahoo.com/news/tractor-parade-

Yahoo News · With tractor parade, Maine farmers protest USDA cuts that could leave many in debtBy Eesha Pendharkar

Todays 100+ #billionaires according to #Bloomberg:

#1: Elon Musk - $311B - USA/Tech

#2: Jeff Bezos - $203B - USA/Tech

#3: Mark Zuckerberg - $188B - USA/Tech

#4: Warren Buffett - $165B - USA/Diversified

#5: Bernard Arnault - $163B - France/Consumer

#6: Bill Gates - $158B - USA/Tech

#7: Larry Ellison - $156B - USA/Tech

#8: Larry Page - $144B - USA/Tech

#9: Steve Ballmer - $136B - USA/Tech

#10: Sergey Brin - $136B - USA/Tech

#11: Jim Walton - $115B - USA/Retail

#12: Rob Walton - $112B - USA/Retail

#13: Alice Walton - $112B - USA/Retail

#14: Amancio Ortega - $104B - Spain/Retail

Total wealth: $2.2 Trillion

Full List: bloomberg.com/billionaires

BWAHAHAHA! Hey, if it works, do it.

It's a new political ad aimed at Gen Z men who voted for Trump and are now realizing that #Trump and the #Republicans only serve #billionaires.

A #GOP Congress critter is literally blowing a megadonor and two working men accidentally walk in on them. A very frank discussion of taxation policy follows.

#oligarchy #fascism

instagram.com/reel/DIeaWcRxvVX

InstagramVote In Or Out 🇺🇸 on Instagram: "Viewer discretion: A provocative new political advertisement from the Progress Action Fund, a Democratic-aligned super PAC, has garnered significant attention for its satirical portrayal of Republican lawmakers’ relationships with wealthy donors. In the ad, two workers discuss the burden of high taxes, only to discover their Republican congressman in a compromising position with a wealthy donor. The congressman explains, “I’m fundraising for reelection and servicing my sugar daddy and lowering his taxes,” highlighting the perceived prioritization of affluent contributors over average constituents. When confronted about promises to lower taxes for all, he retorts, “Sorry. You didn’t give me any money,” before returning to his “job.” This ad aims to resonate with younger male voters disillusioned by economic policies favoring the wealthy.  Joe Jacobson, founder of the Progress Action Fund, stated that the ad targets young men aged 18 to 29 who may have previously supported #DonaldTrump but are now critical of his economic decisions. The ad is strategically placed on platforms popular among this demographic, including dating apps, sports websites, and streaming services. Jacobson emphasized the need for political messaging that cuts through the noise of modern media consumption, stating, “You’re competing against ‘Secret Lives of Mormon Wives’ stuff. You’re competing against LeBron. You’re competing against ‘Love is Blind.’” The ad’s creators believe that its bold approach is necessary to engage a generation that is increasingly skeptical of traditional political discourse.  #DonaldTrump #ProgressActionFund #PoliticalAdvertising #TaxPolicy #YoungVoters #CampaignFinance #WealthInequality #DemocraticStrategy — Help this information get to more voters. 🇺🇸 A well-informed electorate is a prerequisite to Democracy.—Thomas Jefferson THE GLOVES ARE OFF!!! 🔥🔥🔥 From @progressaf3 repost @nickknudsenus"2,076 likes, 76 comments - voteinorout on April 15, 2025: "Viewer discretion: A provocative new political advertisement from the Progress Action Fund, a Democratic-aligned super PAC, has garnered significant attention for its satirical portrayal of Republican lawmakers’ relationships with wealthy donors. In the ad, two workers discuss the burden of high taxes, only to discover their Republican congressman in a compromising position with a wealthy donor. The congressman explains, “I’m fundraising for reelection and servicing my sugar daddy and lowering his taxes,” highlighting the perceived prioritization of affluent contributors over average constituents. When confronted about promises to lower taxes for all, he retorts, “Sorry. You didn’t give me any money,” before returning to his “job.” This ad aims to resonate with younger male voters disillusioned by economic policies favoring the wealthy.  Joe Jacobson, founder of the Progress Action Fund, stated that the ad targets young men aged 18 to 29 who may have previously supported #DonaldTrump but are now critical of his economic decisions. The ad is strategically placed on platforms popular among this demographic, including dating apps, sports websites, and streaming services. Jacobson emphasized the need for political messaging that cuts through the noise of modern media consumption, stating, “You’re competing against ‘Secret Lives of Mormon Wives’ stuff. You’re competing against LeBron. You’re competing against ‘Love is Blind.’” The ad’s creators believe that its bold approach is necessary to engage a generation that is increasingly skeptical of traditional political discourse.  #DonaldTrump #ProgressActionFund #PoliticalAdvertising #TaxPolicy #YoungVoters #CampaignFinance #WealthInequality #DemocraticStrategy — Help this information get to more voters. 🇺🇸 A well-informed electorate is a prerequisite to Democracy.—Thomas Jefferson THE GLOVES ARE OFF!!! 🔥🔥🔥 From @progressaf3 repost @nickknudsenus".

I am not impressed or interested in the little space trip that happened on Monday. I find this girlboss stuff nauseating. I get where Marina Hyde is coming from in her piece in the Guardian: theguardian.com/commentisfree/

It's odd how none of the astronauts thought to quote Gil Scott-Heron's "Whitey on the Moon" while floating around up there ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitey_o

By the way, "whitey" is also a metaphor for "billionaire". Same-same.

The Guardian · What’s more vacuous than an endless vacuum? It’s Lauren Sánchez and Katy Perry’s party in spaceBy Marina Hyde

Todays 100+ #billionaires according to #Bloomberg:

#1: Elon Musk - $311B - USA/Tech

#2: Jeff Bezos - $205B - USA/Tech

#3: Mark Zuckerberg - $192B - USA/Tech

#4: Warren Buffett - $163B - USA/Diversified

#5: Bernard Arnault - $161B - France/Consumer

#6: Bill Gates - $157B - USA/Tech

#7: Larry Ellison - $153B - USA/Tech

#8: Larry Page - $142B - USA/Tech

#9: Steve Ballmer - $136B - USA/Tech

#10: Sergey Brin - $134B - USA/Tech

#11: Jim Walton - $112B - USA/Retail

#12: Rob Walton - $110B - USA/Retail

#13: Alice Walton - $110B - USA/Retail

#14: Amancio Ortega - $102B - Spain/Retail

Total wealth: $2.19 Trillion

Full List: bloomberg.com/billionaires

To think
that everyone wants to be like that

NO that's not what everyone wants!!!
__

To take
what you want to take

To have
what nobody has

To possess
what is unique

To enslave
So that one can rule

To dehumanize
To gaze at the faceless

To rise above everything
to be able to look down on everyone

Who does that remind you of?
A list is also welcome

Continued thread

I've made no secret of the fact that I think the nazi "broligarch" cultists who brought Trump to power, and support the creation of monarchal, technofeudalist city states under a variety of names (Network States, and Freedom Cities most prominently) are working on a larger, dystopian plan for literal authoritarian global domination; a plan that encompasses and revolves around the destruction of democratic structures, the implementation of digital fascist surveillance and repression via AI technology, the adoption of quasi-religious beliefs about our future as exemplified by the TESCREAL movement, and even the fascist plan to remake America into a type of dictatorship under Trump proposed by "neo-reactionary scholar" Curtis Yarvin, also known as The Butterfly Revolution. Taken together, the proponents of these ideas, who are often quite wealthy and influential people in our society and in particular the tech industry, have dubbed their ideology "Dark Enlightenment" which should give you at least some idea of both how obnoxious these rich fascists are, but also how far-reaching their plans ultimately go.

Furthermore, I am certain that this isn't just some weird conspiracy theory for three key reasons. First, the billionaire fascists have more or less told us their plans in the open. Secondly, since buying themselves a president, a small group of hyper-reactionary billionaires led by the world's richest nazi, Elon Musk, have more or less guided the Trump regime to act in countless ways that directly facilitate their obscene visions for the future of humanity.

Finally of course, there are quantifiable structural reasons why what these nazi cultist billionaires are proposing represents one of the only possible futures in which most of the planet maintains capitalism and free market fundamentalist ideology. After all, the planet is on fire, billions of people's lives are at stake if we don't act collectively to address climate crisis, and capitalism is the culprit causing both our impending destruction and our refusal to act; either capitalism and free market fundamentalism go to their graves, or billions of everyday people do, and these billionaire nazis know that. Folks aren't going to keep supporting a capitalist order that's killing them as the bodies pile up, so if you're going to keep doing capitalism for the benefit of an increasingly smaller ruling class, even as it leads to genocides all around us, you're going to need a political system that provides the necessary degree of surveillance, repression, and applied force to maintain control even as society disintegrates in real time - and that political system is going to look a lot like fascism, no matter what they choose to call it.

Despite their rhetoric about "the future" and their love of technology, the truth is the ideas and plans folks like Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Marc Andreessen (to name a few) are proposing to accomplish their goals, are old, decrepit, and often utterly disproven. As a species, we have already learned the horrible outcomes of adopting repugnant ideas like eugenics, feudalism, and fascism as enforced policy; and yet here today these ideas are being repackaged and renamed as the only hope for our future, by a billionaire nazi ruling class determined to rewind our society into the darkest days of our collective past. Down that road leads subjugation, violence, and death; which is probably why it appeals to rich nazis who value "artificial minds" (and labor) over human beings, and are preparing for a world where billions of people are "surplus" to their requirements as techno-feudalist overlords.

To demonstrate this last point, let's look at a piece by J.J. Anselmi writing in The New Republic that identifies a new (old) way to look at the Network States/Freedom cities plan being pushed by Balaji Srinivasan and his ultra wealthy backers; as the author notes, at its core a "Network State" or "Freedom City" is really just a big company town:

archive.is/9B2ZI

Trump’s “Freedom Cities” Are a Devious Scam

"Tech bros love to repackage old ideas as innovation. We’ve all seen it. But their latest foray into disruption no one else wants, the so-called “network state” and its constellation of start-up cities, deserves our attention. This notion has been embraced by President Donald Trump, who has rechristened them “freedom cities.” In reality, the scheme is a techno-fascist vision of the future that’s been quietly but persistently pushed and funded by billionaires such as Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, Brian Armstrong, and Sam Altman for years. Despite the shiny marketing materials for places like Próspera and California Forever, which make outlandish promises of futuristic utopias, the start-up city as a concept is a modern, ketamine-infused repackaging of something that flopped into obsolescence long ago: the company town."

"You may find China’s approach to its financial elite harsh. It is harsh, in some ways, especially if you’re used to the United States’ more hands-off approach. There have even been cases where Chinese bankers have been sentenced to death for things like bribery, which does cross a line into the draconian. But then again, most of the “ex-billionaires” who’ve fallen under Xi Jinping’s regulatory hammer are still around, and still extremely rich—just less so than before. And you have to ask yourself: which is worse, being too harsh on billionaires and their activities, or not harsh enough?

Consider a counterfactual: what if the U.S. government had done to Elon Musk what the Chinese government did to Jack Ma? Say, in 2022, when Musk’s plans to buy Twitter and remake it in his own image started to move forward? There was some discussion back then about American regulators suing to prevent the $44 billion sale, but nothing came of it. But suppose U.S. antitrust watchdogs had blocked the deal, and a little later, made it clear to Musk that there would be serious consequences if he kept meddling in American politics. Imagine someone had arrested him when he openly bribed Pennsylvanians with entry in a $1 million raffle in exchange for registering to vote in 2024, for instance—or when he did the same thing in a Wisconsin judicial race this year."

currentaffairs.org/news/china-

www.currentaffairs.orgChina Knows How to Deal with its BillionairesIn the United States, wealthy individuals like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are allowed to dominate the country’s politics and economy. But there is another way.