lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

70
active users

#ClimateDiary

7 posts7 participants0 posts today
Continued thread

self-assessment, because it's been one long descent toward disaster. #ClimateDiary But, in the end, you can only do what you do, and hope that how you live your life and spend your days does some good -- and maybe offers alternatives to other people that they didn't know were available.

As Paul Farmer said, "You fight the long defeat."

I'm feeling okay for today. In solidarity, friends. 6/6

Quiz on US CO2 emissions by federal administration since 1965.

- source: OWID
- 4-year spans: e.g. Nixon/Ford is one span
- 2nd term distinguished from 1st term: e.g. Clinton 1, Clinton 2

- - -

1. Which admin oversaw the largest tonnage of emissions?

2. Which admin saw the largest aggregate percentage increase in emissions (sum of change for each of 4 years)?

3. Which admin saw the largest percentage drop?

- - -

(Why 1965? No reason other than that I was born in 1964 🤷‍♂️)

Continued thread

The wisdom of the market:

The people who make cars have known for a very long time that their main product is not cars, it’s CO2 via coal to smelt metals. Doesn’t make much difference if there’s an internal combustion engine in it or a battery.

Many have decided to address this by making cars bigger and heavier.

In large part because the market does not want to price in something which it intentionally has ignored so that the secondary product is as profitable as possible

The wisdom of the market:

The people who make steel have known for a very long time that their main product is not steel, it’s CO2.

In aggregate, they have done close to nothing about it.

In large part because the market does not want to price in something which it intentionally has ignored in order to make the secondary product cheaper

Continued thread

…bearing in mind that the postponed legislation is not generating sustainability anyway. It’s about the measurement and reporting of just how little we care about becoming sustainable.

Because as we all know, having good data on our emissions over the last 35 years has helped us drastically reduce global emissions

Join us next week (9th and 10th April) for "What is Possible": an online and in-person workshop at the University of Helsinki on engaged Scholarship on Healthcare, Humanitarianism, Education, and Climate Action.

I will speaking about local governments as a nexus for climate action, based on my own experiences here in #Eastbourne.

Registration free, by 7.4.25
#Helsinki #ClimateDiary

@tutam @avi

helsinki.fi/en/projects/resili

University of HelsinkiWhat is Possible | Resilient and Just Systems | University of HelsinkiEngaged Scholarship on Healthcare, Humanitarianism, Education, and Climate Action April 9th-10th 2025, RESET, University of Helsinki.

Dear #ClimateDiary, I am finding it frustrating today that people who ignore scientists just openly screaming about the approach of a three-degree hell-world are snapping to attention now that a bank has used the same data to promote a bullish outlook for air conditioning

#climateDiary

I took a look at how the UK’s consumption-based emissions (cos those are the ones that matter) have been going.

According to Our World in Data, they peaked in 2004 at 757.04 million tonnes (MT) and have been dropping at an average rate of 2.404% per year since then.

If we carry on at that rate they’ll be 247.17 MT in 2050, which will be about 3.6 tonnes per person (and 37% of 1990 levels).

What chance us carrying on at that rate or better?

ourworldindata.org/explorers/c