Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻💻🧬<p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Ryzen9000" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Ryzen9000</span></a> vs. <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Intel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Intel</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/CoreUltra" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CoreUltra</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/ArrowLake" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ArrowLake</span></a> On <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Linux</span></a> For Q1-2025 In ~400 Benchmarks<br>In cases where <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/AVX512" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AVX512</span></a> can be utilized, the Ryzen 9000 series is the definitive winner over the Intel Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. In some HPC applications the Core Ultra 9 285K with 24 physical cores does well in scenarios where SMP isn't leveraged.<br>Overall the <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Zen5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Zen5</span></a> based <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Ryzen9" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Ryzen9</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/9950X" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>9950X</span></a> straight-up won 50% of the time with a first place finish. <br><a href="https://www.phoronix.com/review/ryzen9000-core-ultra-linux613" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">phoronix.com/review/ryzen9000-</span><span class="invisible">core-ultra-linux613</span></a></p>