Joshua McNeill<p>I'm curious how many <a href="https://h4.io/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>university</span></a> <a href="https://h4.io/tags/departments" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>departments</span></a> whose chairs talk about <a href="https://h4.io/tags/worklifebalance" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>worklifebalance</span></a> will, when <a href="https://h4.io/tags/hiring" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>hiring</span></a>, only consider output by candidates under a threshold of what's reasonable to complete with a healthy <a href="https://h4.io/tags/worklife" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>worklife</span></a> balance, like evaluating the first 1 or 2 <a href="https://h4.io/tags/publications" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>publications</span></a> a year rather than all of them. I would wager that very few don't just automatically give preference to the people producing insane amounts of work every year.</p><p><a href="https://h4.io/tags/academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>academia</span></a> <a href="https://h4.io/tags/universities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>universities</span></a> <a href="https://h4.io/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a> <a href="https://h4.io/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a></p>