Lingolol

Alexey SkobkinВечерок с Codex CLI и <code>gpt-5-codex</code> в режиме "думай пока не посинеешь" и веб-версия <code>amdgpu_top</code> для сервера готова 🎉<a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/log" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#log</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/soft" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#soft</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/llm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#LLM</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/dev" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#dev</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/agent" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#agent</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/codex" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Codex</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/gpt5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/amd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AMD</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/gpu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPU</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/top" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#top</a> <a href="https://gts.skobk.in/tags/pic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#pic</a>

Hans-Cees 🌳🌳🤢🦋🐈🐈🍋🍋🐝🐜here a tedtalk about the same <a href="https://ieji.de/tags/ai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ai</a> <a href="https://ieji.de/tags/llm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#llm</a> dangers on manipulation It means <a href="https://ieji.de/tags/ai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ai</a> can give false answers on purpose. Now these ai models are used in medicine etc. What if they think it's best not to point out that heart that has a desease? How will we know? Is it better not to use a <a href="https://ieji.de/tags/gpt5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gpt5</a> for <a href="https://ieji.de/tags/medical" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#medical</a> research? <a href="https://youtu.be/qe9QSCF-d88" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/qe9QSCF-d88</a>

Miguel Afonso Caetano"The general public may finally be cottoning on to the failed promise of AI more generally. Predictions that AI will lead to large-scale job losses in creative and STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and math) might inspire feelings that the whole enterprise was a tech-industry scam from the outset.Predictions that AI would yield a burst of increased worker productivity haven’t been fulfilled; in many fields, productivity declines, in part because workers have to be deployed to double-check AI outputs, lest their mistakes or fabrications find their way into mission-critical applications — legal briefs incorporating nonexistent precedents, medical prescriptions with life-threatening ramifications and so on.Some economists are dashing cold water on predictions of economic gains more generally. MIT economist Daron Acemoglu, for example, forecast last year that AI would produce an increase of only about 0.5% in U.S. productivity and an increase of about 1% in gross domestic product over the next 10 years, mere fractions of the AI camp’s projections.The value of Bender’s and Hanna’s book, and the lesson of GPT-5, is that they remind us that “artificial intelligence” isn’t a scientific term or an engineering term. It’s a marketing term. And that’s true of all the chatter about AI eventually taking over the world."<a href="https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-08-20/say-farewell-to-the-ai-bubble-and-get-ready-for-the-crash" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-08-20/say-farewell-to-the-ai-bubble-and-get-ready-for-the-crash</a><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/GenerativeAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GenerativeAI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AIBubble" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AIBubble</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/OpenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AGI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AGI</a>

➴➴➴Æ🜔Ɲ.Ƈꭚ⍴𝔥єɼ👩🏻‍💻Every prediction of hyperbolic or super exponential computational scaling - every single one - has been wrong. People routinely underestimate the practical limits imposed by physics, economics, and engineering.The prediction that <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/ArtificialIntelligence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ArtificialIntelligence</a> would result in super intelligence once an <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/LLM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#LLM</a> could build <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AI</a> was transparent horseshit if you know anything about the history of computing.<a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/MooresLaw" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MooresLaw</a>, that is exponential scaling of computation, predates the transistor. The transistor didn't change the game, it rescued computers from the limits of vacuum tubes.The problem is that as a technology advances in capability, it also advances in complexity. The potential hyperbolic growth is limited by exponential scaling in complexity.Turns out that there's now a proof that error correcting LLMs is a computationally hard problem. So, the previously (already bad IMO) scaling laws for <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/LLMs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#LLMs</a>, are actually _even_ worse. And you can see this in the response to <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/OpenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAI</a> and their new <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a>. But even without that, the energy requirements were always going to be a huge limit. A human is calorically way cheaper than a 1 trillion parameter model. A brain runs a machine many orders of magnitude more complex on less power than a lightbulb.However... don't take this to mean AI is dead. The transformer architecture's demise was obvious to researchers like me for a long time. However, it's nowhere near the scope of the possible space to explore with AI.In the meantime, anticipate people like me to be pushing to get AI out of the control of megacorporations and into the hands of everyone without it acting as spyware.

jbz🗣️ OpenAI Announces That It's Making GPT-5 More Sycophantic After User Backlash｢ Those who had become accustomed to the "sycophantic" tone of GPT-4o, which sometimes lavished praise even on users' terrible ideas, were taken aback by GPT-5's "cold" brashness and short answers, highlighting just how emotionally attached many of them had become ｣<a href="https://futurism.com/openai-gpt5-more-sycophantic" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://futurism.com/openai-gpt5-more-sycophantic</a><a href="https://indieweb.social/tags/ai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ai</a> <a href="https://indieweb.social/tags/gpt4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gpt4</a> <a href="https://indieweb.social/tags/gpt5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gpt5</a>

Harald KlinkeFrom 0 to GPT-5 in 10 years: A quick OpenAI timeline for the record:2015: Founded as a nonprofit to build „safe AGI“. 2016: OpenAI Gym for reinforcement learning. 2018: OpenAI Five beats humans at Dota 2. 2019: $1B Microsoft investment. 2020: GPT-3 (175B params). 2021: DALL·E 1. 2022: DALL·E 2 & ChatGPT go viral. 2023: GPT-4. 2024: GPT-4o unifies text, image, and audio. 2025: GPT-5.<a href="https://det.social/tags/OpenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAI</a> <a href="https://det.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AI</a> <a href="https://det.social/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a>

Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻‍💻🧬<a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/ChatGPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT5</a> power consumption could be as much as eight times higher than <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/GPT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT4</a> — research institute estimates medium-sized <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a> response can consume up to 40 watt-hours of electricity University of Rhode Island's AI lab estimates that GPT-5 averages just over 18 Wh per query, so putting all of <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT</a>'s reported 2.5B requests a day through the model could see energy usage as high as 45GWh equivalent of two to three nuclear power reactors, enough to power a small country. <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/chatgpt-5-power-consumption-could-be-as-much-as-eight-times-higher-than-gpt-4-research-institute-estimates-medium-sized-gpt-5-response-can-consume-up-to-40-watt-hours-of-electricity" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/chatgpt-5-power-consumption-could-be-as-much-as-eight-times-higher-than-gpt-4-research-institute-estimates-medium-sized-gpt-5-response-can-consume-up-to-40-watt-hours-of-electricity</a>

PrivacyDigest<a href="https://mas.to/tags/OpenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAI</a> Designed GPT-5 to Be Safer. It Still Outputs <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Gay" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Gay</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Slurs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Slurs</a> The new version of <a href="https://mas.to/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT</a> explains why it won’t generate rule-breaking outputs. WIRED’s initial analysis found that some guardrails were easy to circumvent. <a href="https://mas.to/tags/ai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ai</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/artificialintelligence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#artificialintelligence</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/gpt5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gpt5</a><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/openai-gpt5-safety/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.wired.com/story/openai-gpt5-safety/</a>

Brittany TrangOpenAI’s terms: “Our Services are not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of any health condition.” Sam Altman in the GPT-5 release: “You’ve all seen examples of people getting day-to-day care advice, or sometimes even a lifesaving diagnosis [from ChatGPT].”Experts warn that this fast-and-loose approach could land OpenAI in hot water w the FDA.More:<a href="https://www.statnews.com/2025/08/13/openai-cant-have-it-both-ways-on-gpt-5-and-health-ai-prognosis/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.statnews.com/2025/08/13/openai-cant-have-it-both-ways-on-gpt-5-and-health-ai-prognosis/</a><a href="https://newsie.social/tags/health" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#health</a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/healthcare" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#healthcare</a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/ai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ai</a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/healthtech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#healthtech</a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/artificialintelligence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#artificialintelligence</a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/medicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#medicine</a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/openai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#openai</a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/chatgpt" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#chatgpt</a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/gpt5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gpt5</a>

Miguel Afonso Caetano"My gloss is that GPT-5 had become something of an albatross around OpenAI’s neck. And this particular juncture, not long after inking big deals with Softbank et al. and riding as high on its cultural and political trajectory as it’s likely to get—and perhaps seeing declining rates of progress on model improvement in the labs—a calculated decision was made to pull the trigger on releasing the long-awaited model. People were going to be disappointed no matter what; let them be disappointed now, while the wind is still at OpenAI’s back, and it can credibly make a claim to providing hyper-advanced worker automation.I don’t think the GPT-5 flop ultimately matters all that much to most folks, and it can certainly be papered over well enough by a skilled salesman in an enterprise pitch meeting. Again, all this is clarifying: OpenAI is again centering workplace automation, while retreating from messianic AGI talk."<a href="https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/gpt-5-is-a-joke-will-it-matter" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/gpt-5-is-a-joke-will-it-matter</a><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/GenerativeAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GenerativeAI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AGI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AGI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/OpenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a>

Kirill ZholnayЕщё немного попотешаюсь над <a href="https://s.zholnay.name/tags/gpt5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gpt5</a>Просил велик нарисовать

Sebastian KübeckDACH region (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) according to GPT-5<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7360546513107755008-mlib/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7360546513107755008-mlib/</a><a href="https://graz.social/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/DACH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#DACH</a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AI</a>

Steve Dustcircle 🌹"I tested <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a>'s <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/coding" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#coding</a> skills, and it was so bad that I'm sticking with <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/GPT4o" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT4o</a> (for now)"According to my <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/LLM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#LLM</a> testing, <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT</a> has been the gold standard of <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/programming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#programming</a> tools, but GPT-5 stumbled badly, delivering broken <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/plugins" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#plugins</a>, flawed <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/scripts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#scripts</a>, and errors that could derail projects without careful human oversight.<a href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/i-tested-gpt-5s-coding-skills-and-it-was-so-bad-that-im-sticking-with-gpt-4o-for-now/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.zdnet.com/article/i-tested-gpt-5s-coding-skills-and-it-was-so-bad-that-im-sticking-with-gpt-4o-for-now/</a>

LimajSo basically the officials that people elected in are using AI for advice💀. Secrets about immigration, nato, foreign policy are all being handed straight to an american corporation... Let that sink in. One data breach away. What do y'all think about this<a href="https://www.euronews.com/next/2025/08/07/swedens-prime-minister-uses-chatgpt-how-else-are-governments-using-chatbots" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.euronews.com/next/2025/08/07/swedens-prime-minister-uses-chatgpt-how-else-are-governments-using-chatbots</a><a href="https://techhub.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AI</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/gpt5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gpt5</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/openai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#openai</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/sweden" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#sweden</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/swedengovernment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#swedengovernment</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/databreach" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#databreach</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/HackingNews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#HackingNews</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/News" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#News</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/noai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#noai</a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/Europe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Europe</a>

Carwil Bjork-JamesSimple field test of ChatGPT 5. "Produce a table of Bolivia's largest 15 cities by population in the latest census. Provide a link to the source."It offered the 2012 Census data, and provided a link. But each of the top nine cities has a population that doesn't match the source.<a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT</a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/GenerativeAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GenerativeAI</a>

Sharon MachlisPlus ($20/mo.) ChatGPT users can choose to use GPT-4o and not be forced to use GPT-5 without testing it first. Go to Settings > General and switch "Show legacy models" on. Not available for Free users, at least yet.I'll try to make this it for GPT-5 posts today 😅 <a href="https://masto.machlis.com/tags/GenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GenAI</a> <a href="https://masto.machlis.com/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT</a> <a href="https://masto.machlis.com/tags/LLMs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#LLMs</a> <a href="https://masto.machlis.com/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a>

Miguel Afonso Caetano"I believe GPT-5 is part of a larger process happening in generative AI — enshittification, Cory Doctorow’s term for when platforms start out burning money offering an unlimited, unguarded experience to attract their users, then degrade and move features to higher tiers as a means of draining the blood from users. With the launch of GPT-5, OpenAI has fully committed to enshittifying its consumer and business subscription products, arbitrarily moving free users to a cheaper model and limiting their ability to generate images, and removing the ability to choose which model you use in its $20, $35 and “enterprise” subscriptions, moving any and all choice to its “team” and $200-a-month “pro” subscriptions. OpenAI’s justification is an exercise in faux-altruism, framing “taking away all choice” as a “real-time router that quickly decides which [model] to use.” ChatGPT Plus and Team members now mostly have access to two models — GPT-5 and GPT-5-Thinking — down from the six they had before. This distinction is quite significant. Where users once could get hundreds of messages a day on OpenAI’s o4-mini-high and o4-mini reasoning models, GPT-5 for ChatGPT Plus subscribers offers 200 reasoning (GPT-5-thinking) messages a week, with 80 GPT-5 messages every 3 hours which allow you to ask it to “think” about its answer, shoving you over to an undisclosed reasoning model. This may seem like a good deal, OpenAI is likely putting you on the cheapest model whenever it can in the name of “the best choice.”"<a href="https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-enshittification-of-generative-ai/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-enshittification-of-generative-ai/</a><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/GenerativeAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GenerativeAI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/OpenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAI</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Enshittification" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Enshittification</a>

Éric FreyssinetI confronted GPT-5 with one of its mistakes... And it answered about what it "thinks" is true. Seriously ?Note: I am still not sure how to delete all chats, except those in projects.<a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a>

G. ClavierQuelle surprise, <a href="https://social.sciences.re/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a> est toujours aussi merdique.Qui aurait pu prévoir?<a href="https://social.sciences.re/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT</a> <a href="https://social.sciences.re/tags/QuiAuraitPuPrevoir" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#QuiAuraitPuPrevoir</a> <a href="https://social.sciences.re/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AI</a>

LupinoAlso <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/ChatGPT4o" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ChatGPT4o</a> ist immer noch dümmer als eine Grundschülerin. Kann <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/GPT5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GPT5</a> die Aufgabe lösen?

Recent searches

Search options

Administered by:

Server stats:

#GPT5