Michael Porter<p>More in the "Don't trust search results" department - This isn't even AI-generated, it seems to be just a misconception on the part of the author.</p><p>Okay - While searching for a rough estimate of the size of the observable universe at various ages, I found an excerpt from an Encyclopedia Britannica page (URL in the alt text) that sounded wrong - that the observable universe expands by one light year per year. </p><p>I plugged some rough numbers into Wolfram Alpha and got a value of 6.7 ly. <br>(I like Wolfram Alpha - it usually makes the right assumptions about what I'm looking for 👍🏻)</p><p>The EB article also states that as time goes by, we will be able to see *more* of the universe as light eventually reaches us from farther objects. This is exactly wrong - as the universe expands, more and more objects will recede faster than the speed of light and we will see less, not more. (Not to mention that there's a hard limit on the time during which objects that could emit light actually existed)</p><p>Am I missing something? I'm always wary of forgetting a factor of 2 or something in this kind of calculation...</p><p><a href="https://ottawa.place/tags/Astronomy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Astronomy</span></a> <a href="https://ottawa.place/tags/Cosmology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Cosmology</span></a> <a href="https://ottawa.place/tags/HubbleConstant" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HubbleConstant</span></a></p>