242 #ClimateReparations #LossAndDamage
This is the most embarrassing 'win' of the century.
It took them 30 yrs to come this ‘far’.
Still a [very, very small] step forward in paying for the damages caused by the years of "happy living" of the few rich countries.
But even now 'they' are still procrastinating, finding ways to be difficult.
It's about money after all...
[Lives are not as important as money]
"The world agreed to create a climate reparations fund. Now comes the hard part."
by Naveena Sadasivam for Grist
[Audio available]
https://grist.org/international/loss-and-damage-board-meeting-climate-reparations-fund/
Quotes:
"A 26-member board is finally beginning work on the U.N.’s new loss and damage fund."
"After three decades of work, advocates for developing countries scored a major win at last year’s United Nations climate change conference in Dubai: World leaders unanimously agreed to set up a climate reparations fund. As the planet warms, the poorest nations are being hit hardest by drought, rising sea levels, hurricanes, and a slew of other climate impacts — even though these countries did the least to cause global warming, compared to their early-industrializing peers."
"The board’s to-do list is long. It ranges from the procedural — selecting co-chairs and agreeing on a host country for the fund — to the more substantive: deciding which countries are eligible to receive funding, how to fundraise and replenish the fund, and whether or not the World Bank will help manage the fund."
"As the main contributors to the climate crisis, wealthy countries are expected to be the primary donors to the fund. But before the fund can begin allocating money to poorer nations in need, a number of decisions need to be made."
"Even if the stalemate between the board and The World Bank is resolved, the board will still have many more thorny questions to work out, including which countries will be eligible to receive money from the fund. In the agreement inked in Dubai last year, countries agreed that the fund’s resources are meant for “developing countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change.” But the agreement did not define which countries qualify as “particularly vulnerable."
"“There’s sort of the elephant-in-the-room question, which is when is the fund actually going to get meaningful amounts of money,” said Wu. If the fund receives very little money, the board will end up designing policies meant to facilitate the transfer of millions of dollars — not the trillions that are needed, he said."