lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

63
active users

#pierrepoilievre

18 posts16 participants2 posts today

More Poilievre misinformation:

“‘We will never allow a tax on home equity. Period. Full stop. Not going to happen,’ he said.”

nationalobserver.com/2025/04/2

“Poilievre went on to claim — without offering evidence — that the incumbent Liberals would not let the status quo stand.

Pointing to the spending projections in Liberal Leader Mark Carney's platform, released Saturday, Poilievre claimed the Liberals would need to tap into Canadians' home equity to fund those plans.”

Canada's National Observer · Poilievre says he won't impose a home equity tax as Liberals, NDP talk health careConservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is claiming the Liberals will impose a tax on Canadians' home equity if they're re-elected as the federal election campaign enters its final week.

I've been saying for a while that the policy differences between #PierrePoilievre and #MarkCarney are minor: impose countervailing tariffs on the US, lower interprovincial trade barriers, abolish the consumer carbon tax, eliminate the GST on new homes, build an energy corridor, cut income taxes, spend more on defence, etc. (It's good to see a Liberal sing from the Conservative songbook, though is his heart in it?)

Possibly the most important difference is #crime.

1/2

“Poilievre pledges to cut government consultant spending by $10-billion a year”

theglobeandmail.com/politics/a

However:
“Mr. Poilievre did not provide a dollar figure Sunday for how much a Conservative government would end up spending on consultants, with his cuts. He has previously claimed the government spends $21-billion a year on consultants. However, the actual amount that Ottawa spends each year on management consultants is only a small fraction of that amount.”

The Globe and Mail · Poilievre pledges to cut government consultant spending by $10-billion a yearBy Stephanie Levitz
Replied in thread

@Snowshadow

Not to mention Poilievre was spreading misinformation. The only plastic bags that are banned, as per the regulations are:

“Checkout bags designed to carry purchased goods from a business and typically given to a customer at the retail point of sale.”

canada.ca/en/environment-clima

But of course like so much he says, it’s not true but bordering on the truth.

www.canada.caSingle-use Plastics Prohibition Regulations: Overview - Canada.ca
Replied in thread

Lastly, the Canadian federal election is on April 28. @thetyee’s John MacLachlan Gray writes about wannabe Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre, aka Skippy.

“Politics may have nothing to do with morals, but even Machiavelli thinks that there comes a time in a country’s history when politics are not enough: when a leader is called upon to exemplify what it means to be — in this instance — a Canadian. And frankly I don’t think Skippy has given this much thought.”

thetyee.ca/Opinion/2025/04/17/

#Canada #CanPoli #PierrePoilievre #CdnElxn2025 #Newstodon #NewstodonFriday #FollowFriday

15/15

The #CBC At Issue panel discusses last night's #LeadersDebate: m.youtube.com/watch?v=q59fq-Ts

It was a good debate for #PierrePoilievre, they say, and #MarkCarney showed his inexperience at politics. (FWIW, #Polymarket's odds for a Liberal win went up about 2% at the end of the debate, and then drifted down by the same amount.)

#ChantalHébert points out that if the #CPC were to go up in overall support, that would likely push more NDP/BQ voters to the Liberals in response.

"Maintenant que j'ai repris le contrôle de mon compte, je peux dire qu'objectivement, Poilievre a gagné le débat. Oubliez les analyses à 5 cennes qui disent que Carney a gagné parce qu'il ne s’est pas mis à parler chinois en plein milieu du débat. Il faut évaluer les performances selon les objectifs de chaque candidat."

#JeanPhilippeFournier

Suivre le lien pour plus de son analyse: x.com/JeanPFournier/status/191

#PierrePoilievre #MarkCarney
#DébatDesChefs
#CanPol #cdnpoli #elxn45

X (formerly Twitter)Jean Philippe Fournier (@JeanPFournier) on XMaintenant que j'ai repris le contrôle de mon compte, je peux dire qu'objectivement, Poilievre a gagné le débat. Oubliez les analyses à 5 cennes qui disent que Carney a gagné parce qu'il ne s’est pas mis à parler chinois en plein milieu du débat. Il faut évaluer les

“Few in the media appear to take Poilievre's longstanding rants and threats seriously.”
This is what US media claimed about #donald and he’s already got concentration camps in El Salvador that will torture innocent men. The next logical step will be extermination.
Do Canadians really believe that #PierrePoilievre is just blowing hot air?

“Those who fail to heed, will be made to feel.”

open.substack.com/pub/charliea

Charlie Angus / The Resistance · Book Burners on the MarchBy Charlie Angus / The Resistance

In the Carleton riding, Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy thinks he has a chance of winning thanks to the seeds Pierre Poilievre has sown there:

“Fanjoy calls Poilievre a ‘dream opponent,’ noting that, even on his home turf, the Conservative leader is ‘uniquely unlikeable – people are not unopinionated about him.’”

ottawacitizen.com/news/local-n

ottawacitizenCould a Liberal defeat Pierre Poilievre in his own riding? Bruce Fanjoy thinks soLiberal Bruce Fanjoy always believed there was a way to defeat Pierre Poilievre on his home turf in Carleton. Now the country is watching.

While #Trump is illegally ignoring Supreme Court decisions in order to advance his #fascist agenda, #PierrePoilievre, as Prime Minister, would seek to use, for the first time ever by the federal government, the Canadian Constitution's #NotwithstandingClause in order to end what he calls "#WokeCulture" in the #PublicService and in the #military.

But he denies being a "mini-Trump"

#NeverPoilievre #LGBTQrights #AbortionRights #HumanRights #NeverVoteConservative
#Never51