lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

61
active users

#sciencecommunication

1 post1 participant0 posts today

Hosting this podcast episode was so much fun! Dr. Sarah Gabbott described her discovery of a remarkably preserved 444-million-year-old fossil that puzzled her for 25 years, her prior work on ancient hagfish that overturned the prevailing theory for the evolution of the eye, her path to becoming a paleontologist, her new book on technofossils, her favorite hobbies outside of work, and more!

peoplebehindthescience.com/dr-

What Did Neanderthals Think About Before Bed?

Imagine a world that looks nothing like the one we know today. It’s a place where surviving the day isn’t a metaphor—it’s a real struggle. When the sun goes down, it gets truly dark, much darker than anything we’re used to. As night falls, your priorities change. You’re not thinking about homework, crushes, or weekend plans. You’re thinking about how to stay alive. That’s what life was like for Neanderthals. When they gathered around the fire at night, their thoughts were all about survival, safety, and protecting their families.

Fire: More Than Just Heat

For Neanderthals, fire wasn’t just about staying warm or cooking food—it was life-saving. It kept dangerous animals away and gave the group a place to come together. Sitting by the fire, you might have watched the flames and wondered if they’d be enough to scare off predators like hyenas or cave bears.

Fire also made people feel safe. Its light pushed back the darkness of the cave and gave everyone a place to relax, even just for a little while. You might think about tomorrow’s hunt and what you’d need to do to make it successful. You might also start sharing stories—maybe about the hunt you just came back from or something strange you saw. The fire made people feel connected and calm.

Family: The Heart of It All

Your family would be sitting close to you by the fire. Their presence would bring comfort. In Neanderthal life, family wasn’t just important—it was everything. As you looked at them in the firelight, you’d probably be wondering if everyone had enough to eat, if the younger ones were safe, and how to protect them better tomorrow.

Maybe you’d plan how to find more food or make your shelter stronger. You’d notice if someone seemed worried or cold. Being aware of each other’s needs wasn’t just nice—it was necessary. Everyone had to work together, from the oldest to the youngest. That cooperation is what kept the group alive.

Staying Safe: A Full-Time Job

Neanderthals couldn’t take safety for granted. There were always threats—from animals, bad weather, or even other groups. As you started to get sleepy, your mind would probably still be alert, thinking about what dangers might be out there in the dark.

You’d go over what happened during the day: a risky moment during a hunt or a tough climb over rocky terrain. Your brain, shaped by years of experience and learning, would use these moments to figure out how to do better next time. Every mistake could be a big one, so learning quickly was important.

Dreams and the Night Mind

Even in tough times, dreams mattered. Neanderthals probably dreamed just like we do. Maybe dreams gave them a chance to imagine, solve problems, or revisit the day’s events. Some dreams may have felt important—like warnings or signs.

They might have even helped Neanderthals practice for real-life situations: how to hunt better, avoid danger, or deal with others. Dreams could have also planted the seeds of early stories—ways to share knowledge and experiences with others.

Looking Back on the Day

Lying near the fire, you might think about what went well that day. Did you help catch an animal for dinner? Did you finish a tool that works better than your old one? Remembering these successes would give you hope and confidence.

These thoughts helped people feel proud and reminded them they were valuable to their group. Feeling like you belonged and had a purpose was important—even back then.

Watching the World

Neanderthals paid close attention to nature. At night, by the fire, you’d think about the world around you—how animals moved, what the sky looked like, and how the weather was changing. Knowing these things helped your group plan and stay safe.

You might look up at the stars, wondering if they meant something. Maybe they helped you find your way, or just gave you something to think about. This curiosity about nature helped build early knowledge and respect for the land.

People Around the Fire

The fire wasn’t just for warmth—it was a social space. Neanderthals probably talked, shared advice, told stories, and taught each other new skills. These times helped build stronger friendships and group unity.

You might think about who in your group you trust the most or how to help someone who’s struggling. Making sure everyone worked well together was key to surviving. Your final thoughts of the night might be about how to keep your group strong.

What You Leave Behind

Even though Neanderthals didn’t think about legacy the way we do today, they still wanted to pass on what they knew. As you watched the younger ones by the fire, you’d hope they were learning what they needed to stay safe and strong.

You’d pass down your knowledge through stories, by showing them how to use tools, and by helping them understand the world. That was your way of making sure your life meant something.

Our Shared Story

All these thoughts and experiences show that Neanderthals were a lot more like us than people used to think. They had emotions, deep connections with others, and a strong sense of community. They thought about their day, worried about the future, and cared deeply for their families.

Even though our lives are very different now, we still stay up late thinking about our relationships, our goals, and what tomorrow will bring. That’s something we share with our ancient cousins. So next time you’re lying in bed, wondering about your day, remember: thousands of years ago, someone else sat by a fire, doing the exact same thing.

#NeanderthalNights #HumanOrigins #PaleoPost

References

  • Finlayson, C. (2014). The Improbable Primate: How Water Shaped Human Evolution. Oxford University Press.
  • Stringer, C., & Gamble, C. (1993). In Search of the Neanderthals: Solving the Puzzle of Human Origins. Thames and Hudson.
  • Wrangham, R. (2009). Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human. Basic Books.
  • Zilhão, J., et al. (2010). Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neanderthals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(3), 1023-1028.

🧠🔬 Webinar Alert!
Join ENLIGHT & Arqus Alliance for a powerful talk on:

🔊 Science in Society: How Science Communication Benefits from Open Science
📅 Monday, May 19
🕙 10:00–11:30 PM CET
💻 Online – Registration Required
🎙 Speaker: Hildrun Walter (Uni Graz)

Explore how Open Science can boost public trust in science amidst global crises 🌍🧪

👉 Register now: videoconf-colibri.zoom.us/meet

Continued thread

… the mythical Pillars of Hercules on either side of the Strait of Gibraltar, which have been smashed by Iberian sailors to open a new world for exploration. Just as this marks the exit from the well-charted waters of the Mediterranean into the Atlantic Ocean, Bacon hoped that empirical investigation will similarly smash the old scientific ideas and lead to a greater understanding of the natural world.
The title of the podcast comes from the motto of the Royal Society […]."
#ScienceCommunication

Just published: my 3rd & final PhD paper!

🧪📢 How should we talk about vaccination rates?

Assuming rationality, normativity, or reasonableness leads to very different outcomes.

Findings from 3 experiments:

Open access paper doi.org/10.1177/00332941251340

Data and #rstats code: osf.io/2wy9q/

🧵 And a longer post over on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/posts/alelazic_rs

Our own @BaerbelW traveled to Vienna for this year's #EGU25 General Assembly of the @EuroGeosciences

Baerbel herself did a couple of presentations in Vienna:

* Examples of Skeptical Science successfully collaborating with other organizations so as to better reach shared goals, get more gain for less effort. With so much reward, we're eager to do more.

* How Skeptical Science translates our content into 29 different languages, the challenges of maintaining a polyglot presence. You may be able to help!

Baerbel also kept a daily journal. It's loaded with links to scads of intriguing information presented at the assembly by many researchers, with teasers and organized for easy access.

Post facto virtual attendance , distilled and at our fingertips. :-)

#geoscience
#geophysics
#ScienceCommunication

skepticalscience.com/egu25-per

Interested in pursuing #SciComm as a profession? Then this new Master's program in Germany might be for you: tuition-free (also for international students), entirely taught in English, covering everything from #ScienceCommunication to #ScienceJournalism, #SciArt, public engagement and more.

👉 hs-ansbach.de/en/master/scienc

Application period starts on May 1st.

Hochschule AnsbachScience Communication

You may have seen headlines today - such as in The New York Times - suggesting the possible detection of a biosignature on an exoplanet. It’s an exciting prospect, no doubt. But it’s also an extraordinary claim, and as the saying goes, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (Carl Sagan).

While the molecule in question is associated with biological processes, it’s important to note that non-biological (abiotic) pathways for its formation exist as well (see: Reed et al. 2024 ApJL; Sanz-Novo et al. 2025 ApJL). These results are interesting, but far from conclusive.

Scientists work within a robust framework to test such claims. This includes:

- Peer review and replication
- Community feedback and critique
- Cross-validation through multiple instruments and techniques
- Avoiding sensationalism in science communication
- Building consensus through sustained investigation

I am looking forward to hearing more from the exoplanet and astrobiology communities on these findings before drawing conclusions.

In the meantime, the ripple effect of bold headlines - like "Possible Signs of Extraterrestrial Life" - has already begun. A friend at the dentist this morning spotted a very misleading headline about this on Channel 9 News!

This is where science communication becomes critical: managing public interest and excitement without compromising scientific accuracy.

We should use moments like these to show the process - how scientific ideas are proposed, tested, debated, and refined - to broader audiences. Whether we’re talking about space, climate change, or pandemics, this transparency is essential to building trust in science.

Aliens make for a great headline, but the real story is in how we do the science.

Creationism is exhausting.

Anti-vaxxers are exhausting.

They just keep making the same stupid, flawed, or deceptive arguments over and over again despite these arguments being fully discredited.

And since every new generation joins the web and sees these old arguments *still floating around* you find yourself having the same conversations again and again and again...

It's just so fucking exhausting.

Replied in thread

@3TomatoesShort
There is a form of #MedicalJournalism / #ScienceCommunication that is predatory and abusive.

It takes a recent hopeful discovery that has not had even animal trials and writes about it as if it was likely to be a successful treatment / cure. We could ask others if this is being done by researchers wanting publicity, editors wanting clicks, journalists wanting exposure or some combination of these.

I have not read the linked article. It may not be one of these horrid articles.