Miguel Afonso Caetano<p>"Google isn’t satisfied with its monopoly on the questions we search. </p><p>Google wants to use AI to monopolize the very answers themselves. </p><p>As one Google executive recently explained: “Organizing information is clearly a trillion-dollar opportunity, but a trillion dollars is not cool anymore. What’s cool is a quadrillion dollars.”</p><p>Google plans to use AI to consume and replace the open web. </p><p>I believe demolishing independent sites like mine was Google’s first step in clearing ground so it has space to rebuild search from the ground up for an “AI-first” future. </p><p>Google envisions a future where “Google does the Googling for you,” its AI and ads do the answering – and users never need to leave Google. </p><p>Google will just source information from a handful of sources and partner websites that it controls and selects – effectively creating an information cartel. </p><p>If Google can use AI to censor a travel website from the web arbitrarily and without opportunity for appeal – it can do the same to any source of information it wants. </p><p>And American citizens and Internet users everywhere will be worse off for it. </p><p>So while you may not really care about the plight of some random travel website getting censored, everyone should care about the way Google is deploying AI to build a censorship cartel that lets it control the flow of information online. </p><p>What follows is a lengthy summary of my experiences and my opinions as an independent publisher trying to survive in a monopolist’s information economy. </p><p>To start, let me explain how we got to this point where Google has the power to do this:"</p><p><a href="https://travellemming.com/perspectives/ftc-letter-google-censors-indie-publishers-with-ai/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">travellemming.com/perspectives</span><span class="invisible">/ftc-letter-google-censors-indie-publishers-with-ai/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Google" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Google</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/SearchEngines" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SearchEngines</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/AISearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AISearch</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/OpenWeb" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenWeb</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Monopolies" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Monopolies</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Antitrust" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Antitrust</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Competition" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Competition</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/BigTech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BigTech</span></a></p>