lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

64
active users

#apc

2 posts2 participants0 posts today
petersuber<p>"<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Delta" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Delta</span></a> moves toward eliminating set prices in favor of <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> that determines how much you personally will pay for a ticket."<br><a href="https://fortune.com/2025/07/16/delta-moves-toward-eliminating-set-prices-in-favor-of-ai-that-determines-how-much-you-personally-will-pay-for-a-ticket/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">fortune.com/2025/07/16/delta-m</span><span class="invisible">oves-toward-eliminating-set-prices-in-favor-of-ai-that-determines-how-much-you-personally-will-pay-for-a-ticket/</span></a> </p><p>PS: Lots to hate here. But suppose the model spreads to other industries. (Yes, this is sci-fi for now. But let your imagination run free.) Imagine that academic <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/publishers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>publishers</span></a> used this model to set <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APCs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APCs</span></a>. What would AI tools infer from your institutional affiliation (about available resources), first name (about gender), surname (about ethnicity), submitted manuscript (about guesstimated quality), and past publications (about specialization, reputation, impact)? What odd variables would it factor in, such as the number of Trump-banned words (for political protection) or the number of citations to that journal (for <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/JIF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>JIF</span></a>)? How would it use all this information? Would it lower the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> for you, to bring you in, or raise it, to price you out? </p><p>For airlines or journals, would there be any reason to stick with the model if it didn't raise net revenues?</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Economics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Economics</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Prices" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Prices</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
Putin's IBS<p>On the return trip, the <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> came under fire again and withstood a direct mine hit—yet brought everyone back alive.</p><p>The wounded are now in rehabilitation, and the <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/M113" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>M113</span></a> has been sent for repairs.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ukraine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ukraine</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/putinisamasskiller" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>putinisamasskiller</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/putinisawarcriminal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>putinisawarcriminal</span></a> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.online/@kardinal691" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>kardinal691</span></a></span></p>
petersuber<p>3/ The <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NIH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NIH</span></a> policy is all-green (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a>). It requires deposit in an OA repository, PubMed Central (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PMC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PMC</span></a>). It does not require publishing in an OA journal.</p><p>If you're an NIH-funded author and a journal tells you that you must pay an <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> to comply with the policy, it's lying. Compliance with the policy is free of charge. If a journal asks you to pay an APC, it's only to publish in that particular journal. Consider taking your submission elsewhere.</p>
petersuber<p>The Royal Society of Chemistry (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/RSC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RSC</span></a>) just issued a vague and puzzling statement about its plans. <br><a href="https://www.rsc.org/news/our-evolving-approach-to-open-access" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">rsc.org/news/our-evolving-appr</span><span class="invisible">oach-to-open-access</span></a></p><p>It once planned to convert all its journals to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> by 2028. By which it apparently meant <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>-based OA. But after talking with customers in different parts of the world, it learned that some regions "are not yet ready for fully OA." By which it means APC-based OA. "The resounding message we heard over and over is that one size cannot fit all." By which it means that not all can pay APCs. </p><p>"It became clear that we needed to adapt our vision for openness to account for a landscape that is increasing in complexity and no longer coalescing around a single direction for open research." As if the global landscape had ever coalesced around support for APCs. </p><p>But RSC is still committed to some kind of transition to OA. "We are now shaping our future OA approach to support authors in ways that suit them best in a local context." </p><p>If it plans to support no-APC forms of OA, it carefully avoids saying so. It never mentions <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> and never endorses <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a>. (It mentions one diamond OA initiative in Africa, but it's not an RSC initiative.)</p><p>I'm guessing that it plans to rely on locally customized <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReadAndPublish" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReadAndPublish</span></a> agreements. (I've argued that all such agreements use APCs in disguise.) But if so, why not say so? If it has other models in mind for regions "not ready" for APC-based OA, why not say what they are? </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APCs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APCs</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/South" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>South</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
Christof Schöch<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://bildung.social/@c_hornung" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>c_hornung</span></a></span> <br>Gute Frage! Ich weiß da keine ja/nein-Antwort drauf. </p><p>So eine vermutlich unklare Erwartungshaltung scheint mir aber eher nicht hilfreich. </p><p>Da wäre schon etwas besser: moderater APC für alle, aber mit unkompliziertem Waiver. Oder von der einzelnen Publikation unabhängiges Spenden-Modell. </p><p>Besser ist aber in jedem Fall institutionelle Finanzierung. </p><p>Was ich bei <a href="https://fedihum.org/tags/Diamond" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Diamond</span></a> konzeptuell noch wichtig finde: Nicht nur auf den <a href="https://fedihum.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> schauen, sondern auch auf "scholar-led".</p>
(((@amarois)))<p>[Listening] Webinaire <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/ToutlAO" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ToutlAO</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/OAW25" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OAW25</span></a> "L'option de la non-cession exclusive des droits : un outil pour l'accès ouvert immédiat des publications scientifiques", avec Benoit Pier (croisé à Centrale Lyon jadis !).<br>=&gt; insoutenables <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> fr. 👌! (43 millions pour la <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/france" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>france</span></a>, données Couperin)<br><a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/openaccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>openaccess</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/openscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>openscience</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/costofknowledge" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>costofknowledge</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/cost" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>cost</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/publishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>publishing</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/cOAlitionS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>cOAlitionS</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/ANR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ANR</span></a></p>
Eric Schares<p>Our <a href="https://scholar.social/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> analysis preprint was cited in a Wall Street Journal story today, along with Elsevier's response.</p><p><a href="https://www.wsj.com/business/media/scientific-journals-quality-publishers-6399fc95?st=NQ8a7Z" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">wsj.com/business/media/scienti</span><span class="invisible">fic-journals-quality-publishers-6399fc95?st=NQ8a7Z</span></a></p><p><a href="https://scholar.social/tags/AcademicPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicPublishing</span></a> <a href="https://scholar.social/tags/MetaSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaSci</span></a> <a href="https://scholar.social/tags/ScholCommLab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholCommLab</span></a></p>
Paco Hope #resist<p>Ugh. Stupid APC UPS with it's proprietary network card and screwball console interface. I bought a secondhand network card for my UPSes, and one of them has a non-default password set.</p><p>The password reset procedure is a pain in the ass, and involved a cursed console cable.</p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/homelab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>homelab</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/selfhosting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>selfhosting</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/UPS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>UPS</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a></p>
🏴‍☠️ MC Pablo ∴<p>Évaluations HCERES : la pensée tableur en action pour imposer l’approche par compétences dans les formations ?</p><p>Via le SNESup-FSU Université de Lille<br><a href="https://fsu.univ-lille.fr/spip.php?article301" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">fsu.univ-lille.fr/spip.php?art</span><span class="invisible">icle301</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/ESR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ESR</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/VeilleESR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>VeilleESR</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/HCERES" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HCERES</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Update. Here's an unrefereed letter to the editor leaving the false impression that the UK <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/REF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>REF</span></a> requires researchers to publish in <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>-based <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> journals. (It doesn't require publishing in OA journals; authors may choose <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> instead; and when they do choose to publish in OA journals, they are free to choose no-APC or <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a> journals.) <br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-025-8398-8" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/s41415-025</span><span class="invisible">-8398-8</span></a></p>
gmcs<p>Dans <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@AOC_media" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>AOC_media</span></a></span> : "Derrière la promesse de l’open access, la marchandisation renouvelée de l’édition scientifique"<br><a href="https://aoc.media/analyse/2025/02/16/derriere-la-promesse-de-lopen-access-la-marchandisation-renouvelee-de-ledition-scientifique/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">aoc.media/analyse/2025/02/16/d</span><span class="invisible">erriere-la-promesse-de-lopen-access-la-marchandisation-renouvelee-de-ledition-scientifique/</span></a> (actuellement en libre accès)<br>Historique rapide, le cas MDIP, zones grises, évaluation de la recherche, etc.<br>"Ce n’est pas l’open access en tant que tel qui est à l’origine de la situation décrite : bien des formats d’édition (revues « diamant », dépôt légal en ligne) permettent d’en développer les vertus sans générer les exagérations décrites dans cet article, à commencer par la trivialisation de la publication."<br><a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/OA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OA</span></a> <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a> <a href="https://piaille.fr/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>The _Journal of Optical Microsystems_ has been an <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>-based <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> journal. It knows that its APCs have excluded authors unable to find funding and it wants to solve that problem. But its solution is to switch to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/hybrid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>hybrid</span></a> — removing the APC for some articles but removing OA for the same articles. <br><a href="https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/journal-of-optical-microsystems/volume-5/issue-01/010101/Accessibility-and-Open-Access/10.1117/1.JOM.5.1.010101.full" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">spiedigitallibrary.org/journal</span><span class="invisible">s/journal-of-optical-microsystems/volume-5/issue-01/010101/Accessibility-and-Open-Access/10.1117/1.JOM.5.1.010101.full</span></a> </p><p>The editorial announcing the change describes <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a>, among other approaches. So we know that the journal knows about the model, and knows that it could remove APCs and keep OA at the same time. But the journal did not choose diamond OA and the editorial doesn't explain why.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
mdelhaye<p>22 minutes sur la surproduction scientifique, avec Laurent Romary :<br><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPPbsqcZ4Ew" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=QPPbsqcZ4E</span><span class="invisible">w</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/openaccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>openaccess</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a></p>
Walled Culture<p><strong>Publisher’s cost cutting, including the botched use of AI, pushes editors of top journal to resign</strong></p><p>Walled Culture has noted previously the fabulous levels of profit that many academic publishers have achieved, largely through the abuse of copyright, as explained in Walled Culture the book (free digital versions). And yet those levels are apparently not enough for perhaps the most successful of the academic publishers, Elsevier. A story on the site Retraction Watch reports on the mass […]</p><p><a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/academic-publishing/" target="_blank">#academicPublishing</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/access-to-knowledge/" target="_blank">#AccessToKnowledge</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/accessibility/" target="_blank">#accessibility</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/ai/" target="_blank">#ai</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/apc/" target="_blank">#apc</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/copyediting/" target="_blank">#copyediting</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/editing/" target="_blank">#editing</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/elsevier/" target="_blank">#elsevier</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/journals/" target="_blank">#journals</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/open-access/" target="_blank">#openAccess</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/production/" target="_blank">#production</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/profits/" target="_blank">#profits</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/resignations/" target="_blank">#resignations</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/retractions/" target="_blank">#retractions</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://walledculture.org/tag/subscriptions/" target="_blank">#subscriptions</a></p><p><a href="https://walledculture.org/publishers-cost-cutting-including-the-botched-use-of-ai-pushes-editors-of-top-journal-to-resign/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">walledculture.org/publishers-c</span><span class="invisible">ost-cutting-including-the-botched-use-of-ai-pushes-editors-of-top-journal-to-resign/</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>The editorial board of the 52-yr old _Journal of Human Evolution_ just resigned to protest <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Elsevier</span></a>'s interference with editorial practices, reducing journal quality, and insistence on a high <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> ($3990), reducing its affordability to authors in the field. "We all care deeply about the journal, our discipline, and our academic community; however, we find we can no longer work with Elsevier in good conscience."<br><a href="https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Social-Media-Statement-re-JHE-Resignations.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">retractionwatch.com/wp-content</span><span class="invisible">/uploads/2024/12/Social-Media-Statement-re-JHE-Resignations.pdf</span></a></p><p>There's no sign yet that the editors will launch a new <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> journal somewhere else. So I've not yet added it to the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OAD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OAD</span></a> list of journal <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DeclarationsOfIndependence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DeclarationsOfIndependence</span></a> <br><a href="https://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Journal_declarations_of_independence" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Journa</span><span class="invisible">l_declarations_of_independence</span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Resignations" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Resignations</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>I just got two pieces of <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/spam" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>spam</span></a> in one week from _Medical Sciences_, an <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MDPI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MDPI</span></a> journal. The first invited me to submit an article and offered me a discount on its <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>. The second nagged me for not responding to the first. </p><p>I'm not a medical researcher. My fields are philosophy, law, and open access. This is easy to discover in a simple web search.</p><p>If this medical journal knows my fields, then why is it soliciting an article from me? If it doesn't know my fields, then why is it soliciting an article from me?</p><p>Does it realize that its emails prove that it's spamming researchers at random without knowing the first thing about them?</p><p>I'm sure you get this kind of spam too. When you find time, I urge you to post about it and name names. </p><p>I don't do this often enough. Here are two earlier examples. <br>* July 2017<br><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180801143629/https://plus.google.com/+PeterSuber/posts/CcyhJ7NudEh" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">web.archive.org/web/2018080114</span><span class="invisible">3629/https://plus.google.com/+PeterSuber/posts/CcyhJ7NudEh</span></a><br>* June 2018<br><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180801143627/https://plus.google.com/+PeterSuber/posts/6DfDZABMNSv" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">web.archive.org/web/2018080114</span><span class="invisible">3627/https://plus.google.com/+PeterSuber/posts/6DfDZABMNSv</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>How <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/authors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>authors</span></a> and <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/journals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>journals</span></a> both benefit from publishing <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> slop.<br><a href="https://www.science.org/content/article/shoddy-commentaries-quick-and-dirty-route-higher-impact-numbers-are-rise" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">science.org/content/article/sh</span><span class="invisible">oddy-commentaries-quick-and-dirty-route-higher-impact-numbers-are-rise</span></a></p><p>Authors get another publication for their resumes, perhaps a PubMed-indexed publication. If it's a <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/commentary" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>commentary</span></a>, not a research article, they needn't do any new research. Journals get an <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>, citations to game their impact factor (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/JIF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>JIF</span></a>), or both.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
ndocist<p>Nouvelle stratégie pour le groupe PLOS : plus de FTAs <a href="https://oc.todon.fr/tags/apc" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>apc</span></a> et l'article n'est plus le seul produit de la recherche (jeux de données, codes et méthodes, etc…) | Rédaction Médicale et Scientifique<br><a href="https://www.redactionmedicale.fr/2024/11/nouvelle-strategie-pour-le-groupe-plos" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">redactionmedicale.fr/2024/11/n</span><span class="invisible">ouvelle-strategie-pour-le-groupe-plos</span></a></p>
(((@amarois)))<p>🟥 À l’occasion de la semaine internationale du libre accès 2024, la bibliothèque de l' École normale supérieure de Lyon tiendra des stands autour de la <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/scienceouverte" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>scienceouverte</span></a> et vous invite à des ateliers autour de <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/HAL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HAL</span></a><br>- stands Science ouverte de 11h30-14h : 14 nov. site Descartes &amp; 19 nov. site Monod<br>- ateliers HAL de 13h-15h : 15 nov &amp; 18 nov<br>Détails =&gt; <a href="https://www.bibliotheque-diderot.fr/acces-rapides/actualites/open-access-week-2024" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">bibliotheque-diderot.fr/acces-</span><span class="invisible">rapides/actualites/open-access-week-2024</span></a><br><a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/openscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>openscience</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/OAWeek2024" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OAWeek2024</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/openaccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>openaccess</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/HAL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HAL</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/researchdata" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>researchdata</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/libreacc%C3%A8s" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>libreaccès</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/ENSLyon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ENSLyon</span></a></p>
B!SON<p><a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/TIBopenness" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>TIBopenness</span></a> | Du schreibst an einem Paper und fragst Dich, in welchem Journal es gut aufgehoben ist? Am liebsten <a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a>, aber ohne, dass Du Dich um nervige Publikationskosten (<a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>) kümmern musst?</p><p>Unser Tipp: Teste doch mal <a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/B" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>B</span></a>!SON, unseren freien <a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/OAJournal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OAJournal</span></a> <a href="https://openbiblio.social/tags/Recommender" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Recommender</span></a>! </p><p>Einfach hier loslegen: <a href="http://service.tib.eu/bison" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="">service.tib.eu/bison</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> oder B!SON in 90 Sekunden erklären lassen: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5446/62603" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.5446/62603</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>(1/2)</p>