I suspect the reason AI is supposedly improving productivity is that most office work is simultaneously so boring, repetitive and stressful that most workers are eager to automate it in the vain expectation that they will have less work to do. Of course, that is pure naiveness, since managers, capitalists, and shareholders never cease to come up with great new ideas for multiplying the amount of work assigned to that worker. After all, we are slaves to capital.
"Solving the problem of hidden AI use (what I call “Secret Cyborgs”) is a Leadership problem. Consider the incentives of the average worker. They may have received a scary talk about how improper AI use might be punished, and they don’t want to take any risks. Or maybe they are being treated as heroes at work for their incredible AI-assisted outputs, but they suspect if they tell anyone it is AI, managers will stop respecting them. Or maybe they know that companies see productivity gains as an opportunity for cost cutting and suspect that they (or their colleagues) will be fired if the company realizes that AI does some of their job. Or maybe they suspect that if they reveal their AI use, even if they aren’t punished, they won’t be rewarded. Or maybe they know that even if companies don’t cut costs and reward their use, any productivity gains will just become an expectation that more work will get done. There are more reasons for workers to not use AI publicly than to use it.
Leadership can help. Instead of vague talks on AI ethics or terrifying blanket policies, provide clear areas where experimentation of any kind is permitted and be biased towards allowing people to use AI where it is ethically and legally possible. Leaders also should consider training less an opportunity to learn prompting techniques (...), but as a chance to give people hands-on AI experience and practice communicating their needs to AI."
https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/making-ai-work-leadership-lab-and