lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

62
active users

#research

234 posts194 participants14 posts today

𝗘𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗶𝗻 #𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵:
📌Asking for 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁 from your research participants is essential for transparency and trust.
📌 Ensure that data remains 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝗻𝘆𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘀 by using techniques like pseudonymization and anonymization.
Protecting privacy is a key responsibility of researchers!

𝗧𝗵𝗲 @𝘂𝗴_𝗱𝗰𝗰 & the 𝗨𝗚 ‘𝗪𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆’ 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗴𝗻 have compiled a list of 12 essentials to help you conduct research in a safe way

ℹ️ Read all the tips 👉 edu.nl/cgwc3

#AI #science #research #misinformation

"Published in Royal Society Open Science, the study found that the most widely used language models frequently overgeneralize the results of scientific studies—sometimes making broader or more confident claims than the original research supports. This tendency was more common in newer models and, paradoxically, was worsened when the chatbots were explicitly asked to be accurate."

psypost.org/ai-chatbots-often-

PsyPost Psychology News · AI chatbots often misrepresent scientific studies — and newer models may be worseBy Eric W. Dolan

University of YouTube is NOT an education!

Source: digitaltechnologies.education

In today’s America there are an overabundance of people who think spending hours on YouTube, Google, or some other website makes them an instant expert on a wide range of topics. As a result, they will argue infinitum on minuscule points with those they disagree with on Facebook and other social platforms, citing evidence from sources they found online.

Well…that is not an education, nor is it expertise. Instead the old phrase, “I know just enough to be dangerous;” is probably the best description.

No matter how much time one spends on the internet looking up a topic, they are missing key elements of an eduction and of expertise.

  • Has the work been peer reviewed?
  • Has it been reviewed by anyone…like a teacher, professor, or boss?
  • Has the person seriously considered alternatives or counter opinions?
  • Are they confusing “opinion” or “feeling” with knowledge?
  • Is the research either flawed or biased in some manner; or
  • Did the person quit learning the moment when they found a source that supported their argument?

“…science is a process, not a conclusion. Science subjects itself to constant testing by a set of careful rules under which theories can only be displaced by better theories.”

Thomas M. Nichols – “The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters

Perhaps, it’s one thing for people to argue over some mundane topic. It’s wholly another when “questionable and incomplete research” is being used for making life and death policy decisions, whether it be in law, health care, politics, or a plethora of other topics. Do we really want any of these important decisions based on someone’s feelings, opinion, or gut instinct?

Source: mentalfloss.com

In his 2017 book, The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters, author Thomas M. Nichols notes the following points:

“Americans have reached a point where ignorance, especially of anything related to public policy, is an actual virtue. To reject the advice of experts is to assert autonomy, a way for Americans to insulate their increasingly fragile egos from ever being told they’re wrong about anything.”

——-

“More important and more relevant to the death of expertise, however, is that conspiracy theories are deeply attractive to people who have a hard time making sense of a complicated world and who have no patience for less dramatic explanations. Such theories also appeal to a strong streak of narcissism: there are people who would choose to believe in complicated nonsense rather than accept that their own circumstances are incomprehensible, the result of issues beyond their intellectual capacity to understand, or even their own fault.”

——-

“Anti-intellectualism is itself a means of short-circuiting democracy, because a stable democracy in any culture relies on the public actually understanding the implications of its own choices.”

——-

“When feelings matter more than rationality or facts, education is a doomed enterprise.”

Back in high school, this author had a friend who no matter what, could not be convinced they were incorrect on any factoid we disagreed on, even when they were shown the correct answer in the World Almanac. It was annoying as hell.

Today, such attitudes appear to have gone mainstream, making many discussions, even within extended families, rife with unneeded stress and tension. Hardly a situation for healthy debate or increased understanding. Throw in online stalking, name-calling, road rage, and a variety of other 21st century risks, and one has to wonder whatever happened to old fashioned civility and simple good-hearted kindness?

Is it any wonder that cases of previously defeated diseases are popping up again? Is it any wonder that so many people vote against they own best interest? Is it any wonder that so many Americans believe the United States sits at the top of most global comparisons on standard of living, health care, transportation, life expectancy, and happiness, when in reality we often aren’t even close?

Requiring civics classes throughout middle and high school might be one way to counteract some of these problems. Reinstating the Fairness Doctrine in the media would improve news reporting so that it is more even-handed and balanced (and not just as an advertising slogan). Requiring an overseas trip as part of our education, trade schooling, job training, or military service would also help improve understanding of the greater world beyond our borders. Sure, there are problem areas out there, but there are also a lot of places around the globe that are far outpacing the United States in achievements.

In the end, it takes each an every one of us (me included) to just accept the fact that we do not know everything and never will. Life is and always will be a learning process. And sometimes, others are more knowledgeable about certain topics than we can ever hope to be. And guess what? There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Peace!

在个人层面,科学家应除去追逐名利的心,转而追求真善美。在制度层面,应限制或完全取消集中式管理。这样才能释放出人的无限潜能,包括理解力、创造力与智慧。科学家是具有独立精神的“士”,要克己复理,而不应被领导管束或者被体制评价与动员。

"Here, we map where snow meets the forest by computing the proportion of snowfall over forest. We used a global climate reanalysis and satellite tree cover data to derive the fraction of snowfall over forests at 0.1° resolution."

Work by University of #Utah based Cluster member McKenzie Skiles is cited in this #OpenAccess article recently published by Geophysical Research Letters.

📖🔗: bit.ly/3H6D8Nw

This study sounds interesting!

"Krasner and his #research team found six distinct categories of #Jewish #students they describe this way:

The Affirmed: Students whose pro-#Israel #activism and connection to Jewish identity deepened after Oct. 7
The Aggrieved: #Activist students who felt betrayed by Jewish institutions
The Retrenched: Students who retreated into private Jewish spaces for safety and support
The Conflicted: Students grappling with the moral and political complexities of the #Israeli-#Palestinian conflict
The Disillusioned: Students let down by Jewish and Israeli institutions, fostering skepticism and distrust but not action
The Disengaged: Students who distanced themselves from both Jewish and #campus political discourse, often due to a desire to avoid conflict"

forward.com/forward-newsletter

The Forward · Six categories of Jewish students fill in the ‘missing middle’ pieces of campus antisemitism puzzleA new Brandeis study identifies a missing middle of Jewish students who have been overlooked in the discourse over campus antisemitism.

"China announced a $500M contribution >5 years to the WHO, positioning it as the top state donor following the US withdrawal from the org."

Most Americans are grateful that China has stepped up to protect public health for the world's citizens (funding is meant to protect CN's pop -but the WHO benefits global health security. Trump has abdicated his responsibility, yet again.
#China #WHO #PublicHealth #Health #Pandemics #Research #Science #TrumpRegime #Betrayal #USPol
washingtonpost.com/world/2025/

The Washington Post · China to donate $500 million to WHO, stepping into gap left by U.S.By Lily Kuo

"Health care has proved a vulnerable target for the firehose of cuts and policy changes President Donald Trump ordered in the name of reducing waste and improving efficiency. But most of the impact isn’t as tangible as, say, higher egg prices at the grocery store.

One thing experts from a wide range of fields, from basic science to public health, agree on: The damage will be varied and immense."

kffhealthnews.org/news/article

KFF Health NewsHow Trump Aims To Slash Federal Support for Research, Public Health, and Medicaid  - KFF Health NewsOne thing experts agree on: The damage from the funding cuts will be varied and immense.