Angela Carollo, Aapo Hiilamo and Mikko Myrskylä recently hosted a workshop to "demystify machine learning for population researchers" @MPIDR. More than 50 researchers came together to learn about new research techniques.
https://demogr.mpg.de/en/news_events_6123/news_press_releases_4630/news/demystifying_machine_learning_for_population_researchers_13655
#statstab #212 Eight basic rules for causal inference
Thoughts: Good explanation of the basics; confounder, colliders, randomization, and when to adjust.
#DAGs #causalinference #causal #collider #correlation #r
https://pedermisager.org/blog/seven_basic_rules_for_causal_inference/
To fully realize the potential of our clinical trials, we must go beyond randomization, and use causal inference and pharmacometric modelling and simulation. Advancing both we show that non-linear mixed effects modelling implements the equivalent of standardization in causal inference. Dive into this if you're into #causal #causalinference #DAGs #pharmacometrics, or clinical development #stats.
My old boss is hiring for Causal Inference work.
"Do you have some causal inference experience? Do you want a role that helps you build the science roadmap that impacts millions of customers every single day? I'm hiring in NYC and would love to talk to you."
#CausalInference #whypy #dowhy #fedihire #fedijob
https://www.amazon.jobs/en/jobs/2775999/senior-data-scientist-ring-data-science-and-engineering
One of my favorite science blogs, the 100% CI, has published a new blog post: „Sometimes a #causaleffect is just a causal effect (regardless of how it’s mediated or moderated)“ (by Julia Rohrer).
I like the opener: "It’s probably fair to say that many psychological researchers are somewhat confused about causal inference.“
Causal Inference in R
https://www.r-causal.org/
The book is in the making. What is available so far looks useful for teaching and accessibly written #rstats #CausalInference
Confusion of the day:
In electronics, an "open circuit" is one where electrons cannot flow (at least one switch is open) and a "closed circuit" one where electrons can flow (all switches are closed).
In causal inference, an "open path" is one where information can flow (all variables can vary) and a "closed path" one where it cannot flow (at least one variable is fixed / controlled).
Isn't this confusing? Is there maybe another way of thinking about it that makes more sense?
#statstab #116 An Evaluation of Four Solutions to the Forking Paths Problem from @MarkRubin
Thoughts: Forking paths is an interesting inference problem. Solutions: Adjusted Alpha, Preregistration, Sensitivity Analyses, and Fisherian p-value.
A great read from @rlmcelreath detailing some failures of the research industry's current practices and how we can move forward.
#science #ecology #causalinference #modeling #statistics #Evolution
https://elevanth.org/blog/2023/06/14/some-dumpster-fires-for-your-consideration/
@joakinen Also from this linked post, "(...) asking the right questions is one of the most important skills he’s learned", which is precisely the first step in #causalinference: ask a #causal question. The overlap between (computer science) #engineering and #philosophy through #causality may be one of the clearest examples of this needed change of mindset [1]. @Jose_A_Alonso
[1] https://cs.ulb.ac.be/conferences/ebiss2023/slides/EBISS2023_slides_JordiVitria_1.IntroCausality.pdf
Rethinking the pros and cons of randomized controlled trials and observational studies in the era of big data and advanced methods: a panel discussion https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-023-00285-8
Fernainy et al (2024). BMC Proc.
via the #CasualInference pod https://casualinfer.libsyn.com/