lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

64
active users

#CausalInference

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Tom Stafford<p>So far at this conference I have seen reports of true experiments, natural experiments, difference in difference analysis and regression discontinuity design - but no instrumental variable analysis </p><p>I wonder why?</p><p>I was hoping for the full set of causal inference methods</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ICSSI2025" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ICSSI2025</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/CausalInference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CausalInference</span></a></p>
MinmiTheDino<p>What are people’s fave methods for this situation:</p><p>At t0, all units are untreated. </p><p>As time goes on, individual units are one by one selected for treatment, on an expert’s assessment of their potential improvement under treatment. </p><p>How to measure the treatment effect, either over all units or ideally the treatment effect on each unit?</p><p>Oh, for extra fun, they’re probably not independent</p><p><a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Statistics</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/CausalInference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CausalInference</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Econometrics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Econometrics</span></a></p>
Christian Röver<p>Registration is open for the GMDS ACADEMY 2025 (Hannover, October 20-23).<br>There will be three parallel workshops on meta analysis, causal inference and time-to-event analysis involving Wolfgang Viechtbauer (<span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://scholar.social/@wviechtb" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>wviechtb</span></a></span>), Christian Röver, Sebastian Weber, Vanessa Didelez, Arthur Allignol, Oliver Kuß, Alexandra Strobel, Hannes Buchner, Xiaofei Liu and Ann-Kathrin Ozga.<br>See here for more details:<br>👉 <a href="https://www.gmds.de/fileadmin/user_upload/GMDS-Academy-2025.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">gmds.de/fileadmin/user_upload/</span><span class="invisible">GMDS-Academy-2025.pdf</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MetaAnalysis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaAnalysis</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/CausalInference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CausalInference</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SurvivalAnalysis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SurvivalAnalysis</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/GMDS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GMDS</span></a></p>
MinmiTheDino<p>Hello SFBA! I’ve been wistfully thinking of switching over here for a while and recent fosstodon choices gave me the push I needed. So <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/introduction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>introduction</span></a> time!</p><p>I’m from <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/SanFrancisco" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SanFrancisco</span></a> and moved back here after some wandering. Raising two kids and a dog. Working in tech (sigh) but on <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/sustainability" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sustainability</span></a> at least. </p><p>Interested in and post about <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/CausalInference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CausalInference</span></a>, <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Statistics</span></a>, <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Politics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Politics</span></a>, <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Policy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Policy</span></a>, <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Climate" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Climate</span></a>, <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Energy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Energy</span></a>, <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Dogs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Dogs</span></a>, <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Crafting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Crafting</span></a> and <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Parenting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Parenting</span></a></p>
Martin Modrák<p>This looks great: Andrew Gelman (<span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://bayes.club/@statmodeling_bot" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>statmodeling_bot</span></a></span> ) would be joining Nancy Cartwright and Berna Devezer. Short idea talks, lots of panel discussion and Q&amp;A. </p><p>Join us on April 25th to discuss RCTs, replications, and scientific inference. <br><a href="https://sites.google.com/view/cepbi/talks-gatherings?authuser=0" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">sites.google.com/view/cepbi/ta</span><span class="invisible">lks-gatherings?authuser=0</span></a></p><p><a href="https://bayes.club/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stats</span></a> <a href="https://bayes.club/tags/causalInference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>causalInference</span></a> <a href="https://bayes.club/tags/RCTs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RCTs</span></a> <a href="https://bayes.club/tags/philsci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>philsci</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #307 The C-word, the P-word, and realism in epidemiology</p><p>Thoughts: A comment on #306. Causal inference in observational research is a confusing matter. Read both.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/causalinference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>causalinference</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/observational" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>observational</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/commentary" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>commentary</span></a></p><p><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02169-x" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/article/10.1</span><span class="invisible">007/s11229-019-02169-x</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #306 The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data</p><p>Thoughts: Causal inference is messy business. Maybe we need to be more honest about that.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/causalinference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>causalinference</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/observational" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>observational</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/confounds" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>confounds</span></a></p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304337" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.3043</span><span class="invisible">37</span></a></p>
Tom Stafford<p>Covid-19 Pandemic as a Natural Experiment: The Case of Home Advantage in Sports </p><p><a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09637214241301300" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11</span><span class="invisible">77/09637214241301300</span></a> </p><p>"The COVID-19 pandemic, with its unparalleled disruptions, offers a unique opportunity to isolate causal effects and test previously impossible hypotheses. Here, we examine the home advantage (HA) in sports—a phenomenon in which teams generally perform better in front of their home fans—and how the pandemic-induced absence of fans offered... natural experiment. "</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/CausalInference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CausalInference</span></a></p>
Eric Maugendre<p>Surveys, coincidences, statistical significance 🧵</p><p>"What Educated Citizens Should Know About Statistics and Probability"<br>By Jessica Utts, in 2003: <a href="https://ics.uci.edu/~jutts/AmerStat2003.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">ics.uci.edu/~jutts/AmerStat200</span><span class="invisible">3.pdf</span></a> via <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@hrefna" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>hrefna</span></a></span> </p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/edutooters" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>edutooters</span></a></span></p><p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/nullHypothesis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nullHypothesis</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/probability" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>probability</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/probabilities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>probabilities</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/pValues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pValues</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statistics</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stats</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/education" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>education</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/higherEd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>higherEd</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/statisticalLiteracy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statisticalLiteracy</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/bias" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bias</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/media" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>media</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/causalInference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>causalInference</span></a></p>

My old boss is hiring for Causal Inference work.

"Do you have some causal inference experience? Do you want a role that helps you build the science roadmap that impacts millions of customers every single day? I'm hiring in NYC and would love to talk to you."

#CausalInference #whypy #dowhy #fedihire #fedijob

amazon.jobs/en/jobs/2775999/se

amazon.jobsSenior Data Scientist, Ring Data Science and EngineeringCome build the future of smart security with us. Are you interested in helping shape the future of devices and services designed to keep people close to what’s important?ABOUT RINGWe started in a garage in 2012 when our founder asked a simple question: what if you could answer the front door from your phone? What if you could be there without needing to actually, you know, be there? After many late nights and endless tinkering, our first Video Doorbell was born.That invention has grown into over a decade of groundbreaking products and next-level features. And at the core of all that, everything we’ve done and everything we’ve yet to build, is that same inventor's spirit and drive to bridge the distance between people and what they care about. Whatever it is, at Ring we’re committed to helping you be there for it.(https://www.ring.com)ABOUT THE ROLEThe Senior Data Scientist within Ring Data Science and Engineering plays a pivotal role in shaping how we carry the voice of our customers. We strive to understand their behaviors and preferences in order to provide them with the best experience connecting with the places, people and things that matter to them. This role will build scalable solutions and models to support our business functions (Subscriptions, Product, Customer Service). By leveraging a range of methods including statistical analysis and machine learning, you will explain, quantify, predict and prescribe in support of informing critical business decisions. You will translate business goals into agile, insightful analytics. You will seek to create value for both stakeholders and customers and inform findings in a clear, actionable way to managers and senior leaders.Key job responsibilities- Drive shared understanding among business, engineering, and science teams of domain knowledge of processes, system structures, and business requirements.- Apply domain knowledge to identify product roadmap, growth, engagement, and retention opportunities; quantify impact; and inform prioritization.- Advocate technical solutions to business stakeholders, engineering teams, and executive level decision makers.- Lead development and validation of state-of-the-art technical designs (data pipelines, data models, causal inference, predictive models, data insights/visualizations, etc)- Contribute to the hiring and development of others- Communicate strategy, progress, and impact to senior leadershipA day in the lifeTranslate/Interpret • Complex and interrelated datasets describing customer behavior, messaging, content, product design and financial impact.Measure/Quantify/Expand • Retrieve, synthesize, and present critical data in a format that is immediately useful to answering specific questions or improving system performance. • Analyze historical data to identify trends and support decision making. • Improve upon existing methodologies by developing new data sources, testing model enhancements, and fine-tuning model parameters. • Provide requirements to develop analytic capabilities, platforms, and pipelines. • Apply statistical or machine learning knowledge to specific business problems and data.Explore/Enlighten • Formalize assumptions about how users are expected to behave, create statistical definition of the outlier, and develop methods to systematically identify these outliers. Work out why such examples are outliers and define if any actions needed. • Given anecdotes about anomalies or generate automatic scripts to define anomalies, deep dive to explain why they happen, and identify fixes. • Make decisions and recommendations. • Build decision-making models and propose solution for the business problem you defined. • Conduct written and verbal presentation to share insights and recommendations to audiences of varying levels of technical sophistication. • Utilize code (Python/R/SQL) for data analyzing and modeling algorithms.

One of my favorite science blogs, the 100% CI, has published a new blog post: „Sometimes a #causaleffect is just a causal effect (regardless of how it’s mediated or moderated)“ (by Julia Rohrer).

I like the opener: "It’s probably fair to say that many psychological researchers are somewhat confused about causal inference.“

Confusion of the day:

In electronics, an "open circuit" is one where electrons cannot flow (at least one switch is open) and a "closed circuit" one where electrons can flow (all switches are closed).
In causal inference, an "open path" is one where information can flow (all variables can vary) and a "closed path" one where it cannot flow (at least one variable is fixed / controlled).

Isn't this confusing? Is there maybe another way of thinking about it that makes more sense?

Replied in thread

@joakinen Also from this linked post, "(...) asking the right questions is one of the most important skills he’s learned", which is precisely the first step in #causalinference: ask a #causal question. The overlap between (computer science) #engineering and #philosophy through #causality may be one of the clearest examples of this needed change of mindset [1]. @Jose_A_Alonso

[1] cs.ulb.ac.be/conferences/ebiss