lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

70
active users

#lgpl

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
dorotaC<p>@bkuhn any advice for choosing <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/copyleft" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>copyleft</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/licenses" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>licenses</span></a> for <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Rust" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Rust</span></a> code?</p><p>In a recent thread you mentioned <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/LGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LGPL</span></a> and I'm curious about templating.</p><p>In my understanding it's not possible for the user to replace just the LGPLd library on their system, so it's effectively the same as <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/GPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GPL</span></a> .<br>I chose <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/MPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MPL</span></a> 2.0 instead.</p><p>Same problem exists in C++ template-only libraries, but I found no ultimate guide.</p><p>Are you aware of any?</p><p><a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/cplusplus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cplusplus</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/rustlang" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>rustlang</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/licensing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>licensing</span></a></p>
Turris project<p>Some vendors try to prevent you from using your hardware any way you see fit. Some even go as far as to violate the <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/license" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>license</span></a>. <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Fritzbox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Fritzbox</span></a> got sued in Germany and lost and has to comply with <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/LGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LGPL</span></a>. Well, we publish all our sources on our <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/GitLab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GitLab</span></a> and give everyone <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/root" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>root</span></a> account on their device, so I guess we are safe 🤔<br><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/01/suing-wi-fi-router-makers-remains-a-necessary-part-of-open-source-license-law/?utm_brand=arstechnica&amp;utm_social-type=owned&amp;utm_source=mastodon&amp;utm_medium=social" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/0</span><span class="invisible">1/suing-wi-fi-router-makers-remains-a-necessary-part-of-open-source-license-law/?utm_brand=arstechnica&amp;utm_social-type=owned&amp;utm_source=mastodon&amp;utm_medium=social</span></a></p>
Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻‍💻🧬<p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/SoftwareFreedomConservancy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SoftwareFreedomConservancy</span></a> celebrates <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/LGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LGPL</span></a> court win<br><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/FreeSoftware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FreeSoftware</span></a> warriors celebrate landmark case that enforced <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/GNU" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GNU</span></a> LGPL<br>On the Fritz: German router maker <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/AVM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AVM</span></a> declines to appeal in device rights case after coughing up <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/sourcecode" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>sourcecode</span></a> <br><a href="https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/10/german_router_maker_avm_lgpl/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theregister.com/2025/01/10/ger</span><span class="invisible">man_router_maker_avm_lgpl/</span></a><br><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/opensource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>opensource</span></a></p>
Yazad<p>Hi <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/opensource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>opensource</span></a> experts,</p><p>Could someone explain to me what would be considered static linking in the context of <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/LGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LGPL</span></a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/license" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>license</span></a> for programming languages like <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/python" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>python</span></a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/java" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>java</span></a> or <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/javascript" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>javascript</span></a> / <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/node" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>node</span></a> ?</p><p>I understand dynamic linking with Jars (Java) or wheels and eggs (Python). Not sure what static linking would be here or what would cause the “using” program to be forced to become LGPL?</p><p><a href="https://techhub.social/tags/foss" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>foss</span></a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/oss" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>oss</span></a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/GPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GPL</span></a></p>
Replied in thread

@pluralistic @timoreilly @internetarchive @AuthorsAlliance Many thanks for this elaborate discussion which is painful to grok in its consequences. Interestingly the article only deals with copy**right**. The hotter case for me is copy**left**. I choose #GPL or #LGPL because I want derivative work to maintain the same conditions. So despite recent rulings about copyright failure, how scrapers use my copylefted code does not explicitly transcend the required copyleft into the derivative work.