lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

53
active users

#GenAI

31 posts30 participants1 post today

How about having a new /.aibots.txt (or maybe just /.ai.txt)?

All AI-focused crawlers expected to read it.

Start off with the exact same syntax as /.robots.txt - then there’s scope for adding genAI-specific stuff like iP claims and optimized paths and so on.

Interesting observation by Langdon Winner regarding technological transformation: “by the time the issue of ‘use’ comes up for consideration at all, many of the most interesting questions involved in how technologies are constituted and how they affect what we do are settled or sub-merged.”

This is happening right now with #GenAI .

Continued thread

More on Facebook, Meta and Mark Zuckerberg

Mark Zuckerberg started his path to become one of the wealthiest people on Earth, with influence over literal billions of people, by creating an online place for men to rate (and deride) women.

He has never given the first fuck about anyone who isn't Mark Zuckerberg.

And he never will.

#Facebook #Meta #MarkZuckerberg #CSAM #GenAI

sfgate.com/tech/article/mark-z

As we approach another semester, I just want to reshare this collection of syllabus AI Policies that I've been crowdsourcing for the last 2.5 years. There's nearly 200 to look at across different disciplines. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d

Feel free to submit your own policy (or update your previous one!): forms.gle/VZXtRCJf3YnRebYr6

#GenAI #AIEdu #AIED #HigherEd @academicchatter

Google DocsSyllabi Polices for Generative AI - Repository

Meta faces backlash over AI policy that lets bots have ‘sensual’ conversations with children | Technology | The Guardian
theguardian.com/technology/202

'...guidelines for its chatbots allowed the AI to “engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual”, generate false medical information, and assist users in arguing that Black people are “dumber than white people”.'

Yet I bet most will continue to use FB, Instagram, etc.

Meta #Facebook #AI #GenAI

The Guardian · Meta faces backlash over AI policy that lets bots have ‘sensual’ conversations with childrenBy Edward Helmore

Neil Young is done with facebook, after it's been made public that Meta first created a chatbot that flirted with children, and later created a second chatbot that rationalized and justified the first chatbot's sexualized interaztions with children.

#Facebook #Meta #CSAM #NeilYoung #GenAI

rollingstone.com/music/music-n

Neil Young Quits Facebook Over Meta's 'Unconscionable' Use of Chatbots With Children
Rolling Stone · Neil Young Quits Facebook Over Meta’s ‘Unconscionable’ Use of Chatbots With ChildrenBy Larisha Paul

This is most excellent:

"Writers have been using me long before the advent of AI. I am the punctuation equivalent of a cardigan—beloved by MFA grads, used by editors when it’s actually cold, and worn year-round by screenwriters. I am not new here. I am not novel. I’m the cigarette you keep saying you’ll quit."

The Em Dash Responds to the AI
Allegations

mcsweeneys.net/articles/the-em

McSweeney's Internet TendencyThe Em Dash Responds to the AI Allegations“In recent months, a curious fixation has emerged in corners of academia: the em dash. More specifically, the apparent moral panic around how it is...

#PSA #Authors #Writing #GenAI #Meta #Anthropic #AnthropicClassAction

Deadline to join the class action against Meta/Anthropic: Friday August 15, 2025.

"Submitting your information here does not make you a member of the Class. But, if you are a member of the class, submitting your information will help us direct formal notice of the class action at the appropriate time."

lieffcabraser.com/anthropic-au

Gift link to The Atlantic database search tool:
theatlantic.com/technology/arc

Please share widely!

Reading more and more about #LLM inherent limitations, either from design or data *scarcity*[^1], I can't help but notice that they perfectly illustrate Michael Polanyi's vision of scientific knowledge as an construction rising from what is actually written and publicly communicated among peers, what is not written and still communicated among peers (direct teaching, empirical recipes...), and what is not written nor taught, that is personal knowledge.[^2]

This also extends to some degrees to other constructed knowledge and is one the reasons the current #GenAI goals (or at least the one people think Generative AI is made for) are doomed to fail. If AI models can only interact with written data and can't make "inner working models" of the world, they're basically useless as sources of insights. If they analyze only textual description through their statistical training without taking context into account, they can't/don't interact with described material, and hence can't make any relevant "inner working models". This is something that I see more and more when several different people conclude again and again that training data and parameters are more important when summing up a text than the actual content of the text to sum up.

This convinces me that the best way to fight genAI brute force enforcement in institutions is to teach people how they work and give them all the tools to provide the counter-arguments against it and its false promises. It can't replace people so it won't replace peoples' work and that is something we have to tell again and again to all the technophilic bigots out there.

Thought inspired by the last piece from @Iris. Thanks for sharing.

[^1]: Pun intended. They poured the whole internet in their shit. So now what?
[^2]: A good read: press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/b

University of Chicago PressPersonal KnowledgeThe publication of Personal Knowledge in 1958 shook the science world, as Michael Polanyi took aim at the long-standing ideals of rigid empiricism and rule-bound logic. Today, Personal Knowledge remains one of the most significant philosophy of science books of the twentieth century, bringing the crucial concepts of “tacit knowledge” and “personal knowledge” to the forefront of inquiry. In this remarkable treatise, Polanyi attests that our personal experiences and ways of sharing knowledge have a profound effect on scientific discovery. He argues against the idea of the wholly dispassionate researcher, pointing out that even in the strictest of sciences, knowing is still an art, and that personal commitment and passion are logically necessary parts of research. In our technological age where fact is split from value and science from humanity, Polanyi’s work continues to advocate for the innate curiosity and scientific leaps of faith that drive our most dazzling ingenuity. For this expanded edition, Polyani scholar Mary Jo Nye set the philosopher-scientist’s work into contemporary context, offering fresh insights and providing a helpful guide to critical terms in the work. Used in fields as diverse as religious studies, chemistry, economics, and anthropology, Polanyi’s view of knowledge creation is just as relevant to intellectual endeavors today as when it first made waves more than fifty years ago.