lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

70
active users

#copyleft

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

From: blenderdumbass . org

A large majority of people confuse privacy with data protection. And lately I'm noticing an uproar of ideologies that claim to be pro-freedom in one way or another, but which threaten freedom as a whole. I think there is a certain copyright mentality to them. Certain misunderstanding of ownership which makes fighting for freed...

Read or listen: blenderdumbass.org/articles/th

I want every program that’s required to participate productively in society to be #FreeSoftware

Because Free Software allows me to avoid direct remote control of what I can do. And it enables me to help others with my #programming skills.

That’s why I think we need #copyleft. Ideally the #AGPL, because only that keeps webservices free. And those are programs, too.

(a discussion got me thinking why I contribute to FLOSS projects; besides wanting to share what I create, this is the reason)

#GNU and the #FSF have been fighting for copyleft the past decades. But if you look at their financial statement, you’ll see that their paid staff are just a dozen people. All the others are volunteers.

The Tor project alone has more employees than the FSF. Github has almost 6000 employees. Six thousand.

So the advocates for #copyleft must be us. We can’t point at the FSF and say “they didn’t do it”. They provide resources. We have to use them to protect our freedom as users.

Replied in thread

@mjg59 @greg @glyph

Evolution of existing #copyleft licenses isn't urgent as they do address the issues in this thread pretty well.

The missing part wasn't in the license drafting, but in (a) writing of technically irresistible code under those licenses, & in (b) enforcing the license vigorously if the agreements are breached.

We didn't do enough of (a) & (b) for 20 years & now we're here.

I & my colleagues are plugging away as best we can about all this & we're always open to suggestions.

Replied in thread

@mjg59 @greg @glyph
IMO most comments you're making are about the elephant (er, gnu) in the room. That's certainly a serious problem, but FWIW, I & my colleagues at @conservancy work arduously to leverage #copyleft to defend users against bad corporate behavior & regain user control of your own stuff (rather than mere rhetoric).

Our Vizio suit seeks to adjudicate users' rights to install on their hardware & keep junk out of landfills merely because vendor drops support.
sfconservancy.org/vizio

sfconservancy.orgCopyleft Compliance Projects - Software Freedom ConservancyThe Software Freedom Conservancy provides a non-profit home and services to Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects.
Replied in thread

@renan I agree with you in general, but there are some things that have to be said:

IP has four columns:
* patent
* copyright
* licence
* trade mark

Your points particularly address the 'patent' perspective, but also 'copyright' and 'licence'. However, the latter two can also be 'turned' to use in our favour for #OpenSource/#FLOSS (e.g. #CopyLeft).

But in the usual expression as applied by the commercial world, these *all* are pretty bad. And (software) patents just should *NOT* exist!

Turning modified or extended versions of free software into proprietary software goes against our goal of eliminating proprietary software. It keeps users trapped, denying them the freedoms they deserve. If you're modifying free software, respect that freedom - keep it free. If you won't, then don't make it at all. Freedom for all users matters more. u.fsf.org/user-liberation #FreeSoftware #SoftwareFreedom #Copyleft

u.fsf.orgUser Liberation: Watch and share our new video — Free Software Foundation — Working together for free software

#Appealscourt may kill a #GNU #GPL software license
If #appellatecourt upholds Neo4j v. PureThink decision, which endorsed database maker #Neo4j's right to amend GNU Affero General Public License, version 3 (#AGPL), governing use of its software with new binding terms, current assumptions about enforceability of #copyleft licenses will no longer apply. Issue before appeals court boils down to the right to remove contractual restrictions added to the terms of the #APGLv3.
theregister.com/2025/02/27/adv

The Register · FYI: An appeals court may kill a GNU GPL software licenseBy Thomas Claburn