lingo.lol is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for linguists, philologists, and other lovers of languages.

Server stats:

70
active users

#researchgate

1 post1 participant0 posts today

After some consideration, I deleted my ResearchGate profile. It wasn't a terrible experience, although I never felt comfortable uploading papers to their system. In the end, I decided that belonging to another Facebook-like social network wasn't justified. It feels better to narrow down the social media presence. Online marketing and networking aren't my strengths. Anyone interested in my research can easily find me via a simple search and email message.

@fresseng Thanks for the inspiration!

The opening sentence of this: "one of the most popular academic social networking sites is [ResearchGate]"

🤔 This may be factually correct but it really doesn't feel like it anymore. I always felt that RG was, frankly, $hit, but accepted that it appeared popular among scholars. But today? I rarely come across it.

The Now-Defunct #ResearchGate Score and the Extant Research Interest Score: A Continued Debate on #Metrics of a Highly Popular #Academic #SocialNetworking Site doi.org/10.1515/opis-2024-0011

De Gruyter · The Now-Defunct ResearchGate Score and the Extant Research Interest Score: A Continued Debate on Metrics of a Highly Popular Academic Social Networking SiteAcademics might employ science social media or academic social networking sites (ASNSs), such as ResearchGate (RG), to showcase and promote their academic work, research, or published papers. In turn, RG provides usage statistics and performance metrics such as the now-defunct RG Score and the Research Interest Score (RIS) that offer a form of recognition about a researcher’s popularity, or how research is being used or appreciated. As part of a larger appreciation of how ASNSs contribute to knowledge sharing, in this article, the RG Score is reappraised, reflecting on why this metric may have been abandoned while reflecting on whether RIS is any better as an author-based altmetric. Similar to the RG Score, RG does not transparently indicate the precise equation used to calculate RIS, nor is any rationale provided for the weighting of its four factors (other reads, full-text reads, recommendations, and citations), which carry a relative weighting of 0.05, 0.15, 0.25, and 0.5, respectively. Ultimately, the responsible use of RG’s altmetrics lies in users’ hands, although caution is advised regarding their use to formally characterize or rank academics or research institutes.

Does anyone have any info on notedsource.io? I've been spammed on LinkedIn, and I've gone through their site, sign-up, etc. and still can't figure out exactly what they do. I thought it was a place like upwork for academics, but so far it just seems like a startup trying to compete with #researchgate--a bunch of academics and nobody else. Not sure I understand how to use the service or what it's really for.

Any info is appreciated, because it's a little mysterious to me, right now.

I wish there was a way to follow researchers' ORCIDs.
- Has someone created a way to do this?
- If not, would it be trivial for a coding-competent person to allow us to get an #email when an #ORCID profile is updated?

Relying on researchers to make followable profiles on #GoogleScholar or #ResearchGate renders loads of #research unfollowable. However, journals often *require* researchers to report (and therefore generate) their ORCID.

#data#webDev#RSS
Continued thread

After I presented the abovementioned results in the Atheism & Analytical Thinking session,

Tatsunori (Nori) Ishii presented "Analytic #atheism in #Japan: Examining the association between analytic thinking and #religious belief"

Among thousands of people from Japan (in two studies), Nori repeatedly found small analytic atheism correlations.

Follow Nori on #ResearchGate: researchgate.net/profile/Tatsu

#PublicationManagement in the #OnePersonLibrary

In our discipline, #preprint publications are on the rise.

We are currently trying to track how our institute members publish what, when and where.

For example, on #arxiv servers, but also in collaborative writing platforms such as #authorea.

There are also journals like elife that require a preprint for #OpenPeerReview procedures.

Research in #openAlex, #Zenodo, #ResearchGate, #ORCID profiles etc..

#ResearchAssessment discourse

#Publikationsmanagement in der #OnePersonLibrary

In unserer Fachdisziplin nehmen #Preprint-Publikationen zu.

Aktuell versuchen wir nachzuvollziehen, wie unsere Institutsangehörigen wann was wo veröffentlichen.

Etwa auf #arxiv-Servern, aber auch in kollaborativen Schreib-Plattformen wie #authorea.

Es gibt auch Journale wie elife, die ein Preprint für #OpenPeerReview-Verfahren verlangen.

Recherchen in #openAlex, #Zenodo, #ResearchGate, #ORCID-Profilen etc..

#ResearchAssessment-Diskurs